Session Type
Rooms
Addressed to: Andrologists and embryologists at the Assisted Reproduction Lab
Course objetive: To provide practical training in fundamental and advanced techniques of Andrology, to optimize the quality of work in the laboratory and to promote the implementation of homogeneous criteria in the Assisted Reproduction centers in Latin America.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Table 1 | Routine semen analysis (Volume, pH, Motility, Viability and sperm concentration)
Table 1 | Routine semen analysis (Volume, pH, Motility, Viability and sperm concentration)
|
||
|
Table 2 | Sperm morphology and vitality (Microscopic visualization)
Table 2 | Sperm morphology and vitality (Microscopic visualization)
|
||
|
Table 3 | Automated Analysis + AI
Table 3 | Automated Analysis + AI
|
||
|
Table 4 | Sperm selection
Table 4 | Sperm selection
|
||
|
Table 5 | ADN fragmentation and oxidative stress
Table 5 | ADN fragmentation and oxidative stress
|
Addressed to: Speacialists in Assisted Reproduction
Course objective: To deepen knowledge for specialists in reproductive medicine.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Gamete compatibility: a critical choice for oocyte selection?
Gamete compatibility: a critical choice for oocyte selection?
|
|
| 14:20 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
|
| 14:30 |
Sperm and its source: Does it change the Assisted Reproduction?
Sperm and its source: Does it change the Assisted Reproduction?
|
|
| 14:50 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
|
| 15:00 |
The embryo: time-lapse and metabolomics: where are we?
The embryo: time-lapse and metabolomics: where are we?
|
|
| 15:20 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
|
| 15:30 |
PGT-P - different interests and implications: for whom?
PGT-P - different interests and implications: for whom?
|
|
| 15:50 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Clinical andrologists, biologists and embryologists of the Assisted Reproduction, specialists in reproductive medicine.
Course objective: To offer a comprehensive and critical update on the most relevant advances in the evaluation, diagnosis and management of the male factor, integrating the latest scientific evidence with daily clinical practice.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
What tests to perform on seminal plasma (Ideal routine)
What tests to perform on seminal plasma (Ideal routine)
|
|
| 14:20 |
Retrograde ejaculation, advances in technique.
Retrograde ejaculation, advances in technique.
|
|
| 14:40 |
Asthenozoospermia/Teratozoospermia, which we have within our reach
Asthenozoospermia/Teratozoospermia, which we have within our reach
|
|
| 15:10 |
Is sperm FISH still useful?
Is sperm FISH still useful?
|
|
| 15:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Leaders, managers, clinic and laboratory directors, and business development executives.
Course objetive: To train professionals in the field of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) to gain the strategic, financial and ethical knowledge essential to manage, innovate and expand high-quality fertility clinics and services.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Changes in Latin America are knocking at the door.
Changes in Latin America are knocking at the door.
|
|
| 14:30 |
Strategy, transition and future readiness: a legacy for the next generation
Strategy, transition and future readiness: a legacy for the next generation
|
|
| 15:00 |
How to optimize business success, quality, and personalized experiences?
How to optimize business success, quality, and personalized experiences?
|
|
| 15:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Nurses, obstetricians, midwives who work in the area of assisted reproduction or require advanced knowledge.
Course objective: Strengthen skills and update knowledge in the area.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Importance of the male factor and its implications in the results of a high complexity treatment - role of the obstetrician and nurse in R.A.
Importance of the male factor and its implications in the results of a high complexity treatment - role of the obstetrician and nurse in R.A.
|
|
| 14:30 |
New perspectives on the impact of fertility preservation - Educational role of obstetricians and nurses in assisted reproductive technology.
New perspectives on the impact of fertility preservation - Educational role of obstetricians and nurses in assisted reproductive technology.
|
|
| 15:00 |
What does the endometrium tell us today? Endometrial receptivity/microbiota test. Educational role of healthcare professionals in A.R.
What does the endometrium tell us today? Endometrial receptivity/microbiota test. Educational role of healthcare professionals in A.R.
|
|
| 15:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Psychologists
Course objetive: Develop practical tools for psychological intervention and emotional support, applicable in different phases of the reproductive process.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Communication and emotional management in assisted reproduction processes
Communication and emotional management in assisted reproduction processes
|
|
| 14:30 |
A desire for perfection? Emotions, ethics, and expectations in preimplantation genetic testing
A desire for perfection? Emotions, ethics, and expectations in preimplantation genetic testing
|
|
| 15:00 |
Born through ART: Bioethical discussions surrounding communication about origin
Born through ART: Bioethical discussions surrounding communication about origin
|
|
| 15:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|

| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Opening & strategic vision
Opening & strategic vision
|
|
| 14:15 |
Carrier testing (Carrier Screening):
Carrier testing (Carrier Screening):
|
|
| 14:45 |
Fertility Panel: When to Investigate Beyond the Basics
Fertility Panel: When to Investigate Beyond the Basics
|
|
| 15:00 |
Dominant Disease Panel: Real Risk in Reproduction
Dominant Disease Panel: Real Risk in Reproduction
|
|
| 15:30 |
Use of Genetic Panels in Couples, Donors and Recipients
Use of Genetic Panels in Couples, Donors and Recipients
|
Addressed to: Andrologists and embryologists at the Assisted Reproduction Lab
Course objetive: To provide practical training in fundamental and advanced techniques of Andrology, to optimize the quality of work in the laboratory and to promote the implementation of homogeneous criteria in the Assisted Reproduction centers in Latin America.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Table 1 | Routine semen analysis (Volume, pH, Motility, Viability and sperm concentration)
Table 1 | Routine semen analysis (Volume, pH, Motility, Viability and sperm concentration)
|
||
|
Table 2 | Sperm morphology and vitality (Microscopic visualization)
Table 2 | Sperm morphology and vitality (Microscopic visualization)
|
||
|
Table 3 | Automated Analysis + AI
Table 3 | Automated Analysis + AI
|
||
|
Table 4 | Sperm selection
Table 4 | Sperm selection
|
||
|
Table 5 | ADN fragmentation and oxidative stress
Table 5 | ADN fragmentation and oxidative stress
|
Addressed to: Speacialists in Assisted Reproduction
Course objective: To deepen knowledge for specialists in reproductive medicine.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
The immunology of implantation: is the soil prepared?
The immunology of implantation: is the soil prepared?
|
|
| 16:50 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
|
| 17:00 |
Implementation failure: where is it, how to overcome it?
Implementation failure: where is it, how to overcome it?
|
|
| 17:20 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
|
| 17:30 |
Nutrition - supplements and infertility: is there a rationale?
Nutrition - supplements and infertility: is there a rationale?
|
|
| 17:50 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
|
| 18:00 |
Asking to the specialists
Asking to the specialists
|
Addressed to: Clinical andrologists, biologists and embryologists of the Assisted Reproduction, specialists in reproductive medicine.
Course objective: To offer a comprehensive and critical update on the most relevant advances in the evaluation, diagnosis and management of the male factor, integrating the latest scientific evidence with daily clinical practice.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
When is pentoxifylline useful?
When is pentoxifylline useful?
|
|
| 16:50 |
Fragmentation, diagnosis and treatment in men.
Fragmentation, diagnosis and treatment in men.
|
|
| 17:10 |
How does the male factor affect embryonic development?
How does the male factor affect embryonic development?
|
|
| 17:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Leaders, managers, clinic and laboratory directors, and business development executives.
Course objetive: To train professionals in the field of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) to gain the strategic, financial and ethical knowledge essential to manage, innovate and expand high-quality fertility clinics and services.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
Errors in the Assisted Reproduction laboratory: how to prevent them and ensure excellence from an accreditor's perspective
Errors in the Assisted Reproduction laboratory: how to prevent them and ensure excellence from an accreditor's perspective
|
|
| 17:00 |
The key to success in Assisted Reproduction: how quality indicators and efficiency can make all the difference
The key to success in Assisted Reproduction: how quality indicators and efficiency can make all the difference
|
|
| 17:30 |
Data analysis in the laboratory: the secret to detecting errors and ensuring perfect embryonic development
Data analysis in the laboratory: the secret to detecting errors and ensuring perfect embryonic development
|
|
| 18:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Nurses, obstetricians, midwives who work in the area of assisted reproduction or require advanced knowledge.
Course objective: Strengthen skills and update knowledge in the area.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its application in Assisted Reproduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its application in Assisted Reproduction
|
|
| 17:00 |
Genetic tests indicated in medical consultation - Educational role of the Nurse - Obstetrician - Midwife
Genetic tests indicated in medical consultation - Educational role of the Nurse - Obstetrician - Midwife
|
|
| 17:30 |
How to address bioethical challenges in the care of patients with fertility problems
How to address bioethical challenges in the care of patients with fertility problems
|
|
| 18:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Psychologists
Course objetive: Develop practical tools for psychological intervention and emotional support, applicable in different phases of the reproductive process.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
Biology and psychological impact: discourses, communication and decision-making in gamete donation
Biology and psychological impact: discourses, communication and decision-making in gamete donation
|
|
| 17:00 |
Donor evaluation. Research-based updates
Donor evaluation. Research-based updates
|
|
| 17:30 |
Honoring the journey: The psychologist's role in the patient's decision to stop fertility treatments
Honoring the journey: The psychologist's role in the patient's decision to stop fertility treatments
|
|
| 18:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Physicians specializing in human reproduction, gynecology, and urology, as well as geneticists. Embryologists (biomedical scientists, biologists, biotechnologists…) Clinical coordinators Gamete bank professionals Multidisciplinary IVF teams (nursing).
Course objective: To empower IVF professionals to use, in a practical way: Carrier testing Fertility panel Dominant disease panel PGT-A with new technologies as real tools to support clinical decision-making, and not just as automated protocols.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
PGT-A Today: New Technologies and Clinical Benefit
PGT-A Today: New Technologies and Clinical Benefit
|
|
| 16:50 |
Evolution of PGT-A (NGS, resolution, accuracy, mosaicism)
Evolution of PGT-A (NGS, resolution, accuracy, mosaicism)
|
|
| 17:15 |
Session 3: communication & shared decision
Session 3: communication & shared decision
|
|
| 17:30 |
Discussion of clinical cases
Discussion of clinical cases
|
|
| 18:15 |
Closing remarks and a vision for the future
Closing remarks and a vision for the future
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 19:00 |
Big data after 35 years of Latin American Registry of Assisted Reproduction
Big data after 35 years of Latin American Registry of Assisted Reproduction
|
|
| 19:30 |
New patients data identification system
New patients data identification system
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 08:15 |
Sperm DNA Fragmentation: causes, evaluation and management in male infertility
Sperm DNA Fragmentation: causes, evaluation and management in male infertility
|
|
| 08:30 |
Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle
Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle
|
|
| 08:45 |
Q&A
Q&A
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Anvisa: the Brazilian experience in reproductive technologies regulation
Anvisa: the Brazilian experience in reproductive technologies regulation
|
Addressed to: Gynecological physicians interested in minimally invasive gynecological surgery, specialists in AR and advanced residents.
Course objective: To train surgical skills in laparoscopy and applied to gynecology and infertility; to practice basic, intermediate and advanced techniques in simulators and biological models; to promote academic exchange among Latin American specialists.
Contents: Laparoscopic techniques, ergonomics, knots, etc.; technological innovations in reproductive surgery.
Benefits: Official certification of participation; networking with regional leaders in reproductive surgery.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Group 1
Group 1
|

| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 10:00 |
Mastering Ultra-Fast Vitrification Protocols: From Principles to Live Practical Demonstration
Mastering Ultra-Fast Vitrification Protocols: From Principles to Live Practical Demonstration
|

| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 10:00 |
Detección de Triploidias embrionarias: Morfocinética vs Genética
Detección de Triploidias embrionarias: Morfocinética vs Genética
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 11:00 |
Alimentation impact in male and female fertility
Alimentation impact in male and female fertility
|
|
| 11:20 |
Emotional managements in patients under ART treatment
Emotional managements in patients under ART treatment
|
|
| 11:40 |
Body Builders and male subfertility or sexual disfunction?
Body Builders and male subfertility or sexual disfunction?
|
|
| 12:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 11:00 |
AI in oocytes selection
AI in oocytes selection
|
|
| 11:20 |
AI in sperm selection
AI in sperm selection
|
|
| 11:40 |
AI in embryo selection
AI in embryo selection
|
|
| 12:00 |
Discusión
Discusión
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 12:30 |
Hacia una ovodonación más eficiente: ¿todos los protocolos son iguales? Lunch Symposium sponsored by Merck
Hacia una ovodonación más eficiente: ¿todos los protocolos son iguales? Lunch Symposium sponsored by Merck
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Hysteroscopy in cesarian scar pregnancy treatment
Hysteroscopy in cesarian scar pregnancy treatment
|
|
| 14:20 |
Intramural fibroids and IVF. When to operate and when not to
Intramural fibroids and IVF. When to operate and when not to
|
|
| 14:40 |
Secondary infertility related to Istchmocele: Current perspectives in reproductive surgery
Secondary infertility related to Istchmocele: Current perspectives in reproductive surgery
|
|
| 15:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
From Double Helix to Double Trouble: Sperm DNA Fragmentation Unveiled - A Reproductive Urologist Perspective
From Double Helix to Double Trouble: Sperm DNA Fragmentation Unveiled - A Reproductive Urologist Perspective
|
|
| 14:20 |
Male infertility and endocrine disruptors. Reproductive outcomes
Male infertility and endocrine disruptors. Reproductive outcomes
|
|
| 14:40 |
Artificial spermatogenesis
Artificial spermatogenesis
|
|
| 15:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Gynecological physicians interested in minimally invasive gynecological surgery, specialists in AR and advanced residents.
Course objective: To train surgical skills in laparoscopy and applied to gynecology and infertility; to practice basic, intermediate and advanced techniques in simulators and biological models; to promote academic exchange among Latin American specialists.
Contents: Laparoscopic techniques, ergonomics, knots, etc.; technological innovations in reproductive surgery.
Benefits: Official certification of participation; networking with regional leaders in reproductive surgery.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Group 2
Group 2
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 15:30 |
Ovarian stimulation and its impact on the egg quality
Ovarian stimulation and its impact on the egg quality
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
REPRODUCIBILITY OF A COMMERCIAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SCORE FOR OOCYTE QUALITY
REPRODUCIBILITY OF A COMMERCIAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SCORE FOR OOCYTE QUALITY
Objective: Oocyte quality is a key determinant of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) outcomes. Traditional morphological assessment is subjective and operator-dependent; therefore, artificial intelligence (AI) tools have emerged designed to provide an individualized probability of blastulation from a single 2D pre-ICSI image. Before clinical implementation, such scores must demonstrate adequate analytical reproducibility and reliability at the oocyte level. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and measurement stability of a commercially available single-image AI blastulation prediction tool under controlled laboratory conditions.
Methods: Forty-two denuded oocytes obtained from infertile patients were analyzed prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). All patients provided informed consent for the use of oocyte images for research purposes. A commercially available AI system predicting blastulation probability (%) from a single 2D image was used. To assess reproducibility, each oocyte was imaged three times in consecutive cohort-wide rounds (R1, R2, R3) under standardized settings (fixed focus, illumination, magnification, orientation), with images captured sequentially from oocyte 1 to N in each round. All three acquisition rounds were completed within 5 to 8 minutes. All images were processed independently by the AI system, masked to round identifiers. Reproducibility was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(2,1) for single-measure reliability and ICC(2,3) for the reliability of the mean of three readings. Within-oocyte standard deviation (SD) and the repeatability coefficient (RC = 1.96·√2·SD), expressed in percentage points (pp), were calculated to estimate the expected absolute difference between two repeated reads attributable solely to measurement noise. Secondary analyses included Bland–Altman plots (bias and 95% limits of agreement), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to assess correlation and agreement, order-effect testing by randomized block ANOVA, and the intra-oocyte coefficient of variation (CVw%) with a pre-specified high-variation flag defined as range >10 pp or CVw% >20%.
Results: A total of 126 images (three per oocyte) were analyzed. The overall mean probability was 48.7% (range 28–61%), with an oocyte level median of 50.0% [46.1–52.8]. Single-read reliability was ICC(2,1) = 0.59 (95% CI 0.27–0.80), improving to ICC(2,3) = 0.81 (95% CI 0.52–0.92) for the mean of three readings. Within-oocyte SD was 4.6 pp, yielding a repeatability coefficient of ±12.7 pp.. Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias between rounds, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from ±11 to ±15 pp. Lin's CCC ranged from 0.46 to 0.64 across reading pairs. No significant order effect was detected (F = 0.367, p = 0.694). Overall, 11.9% of oocytes met the pre-specified high-variation flag (range >10 pp or CVw% >20%).
|
||
|
HIGHER BLASTOCYST FORMATION AND EUPLOIDY RATES USING HYPERSPERM IN IVF AND ICSI CYCLES
HIGHER BLASTOCYST FORMATION AND EUPLOIDY RATES USING HYPERSPERM IN IVF AND ICSI CYCLES
Methods: Prospective, multicenter sibling-oocyte study included 58 couples (women aged 20–41 years; men aged 20–55 years) undergoing conventional IVF or ICSI at four clinics between August 2023 and December 2025. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) or MII oocytes were divided into two groups and inseminated with sperm prepared either by density gradient (Control) or HyperSperm. Outcomes analyzed were embryo quality, euploidy rate, fertilization rate and blastocyst formation rate. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi square test, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: In IVF cycles (n = 41), fertilization rates were comparable between groups (71.6% vs. 72.3%). However, the blastocyst rate per fertilized oocyte was significantly higher in the HyperSperm group (55.6% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.0038), resulting in a greater number of blastocysts per cycle compared with Control. The utilizable blastocyst rate was also higher in the HyperSperm group (48.9% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.0104). In ICSI cycles (n = 17), fertilization rates were comparable (71.9% vs. 69.3%). The blastocyst rate per fertilized oocyte showed a trend toward improvement in the HyperSperm group (73.4% vs. 66.1%), resulting in a higher number of blastocysts per cycle compared with Control. A total of 115 embryos were analyzed by PGT-A (58 Control; 57 HyperSperm). The euploidy rate was significantly higher in embryos derived from HyperSperm-treated sperm compared with conventional preparation (50.0% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.03). This improvement was observed in both IVF (53.1% vs. 31.3%) and ICSI (45.8% vs. 26.9%) cycles. Although overall blastocyst quality distribution did not differ significantly between groups, the HyperSperm arm showed a higher proportion of grade AA blastocysts compared with Control. Conclusion: Cycles including HyperSperm had more high quality, euploid embryos regardless of fertilization method. These findings support the use of HyperSperm in a wide population of patients as a strategy to enhance embryo competence and improve clinical outcomes. |
GUILLERMINA LUQUE |
|
|
ELECTRONIC WITNESSING BEYOND IDENTIFICATION: DETECTING OPERATIONAL VULNERABILITIES DURING EARLY IMPLEMENTATION IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
ELECTRONIC WITNESSING BEYOND IDENTIFICATION: DETECTING OPERATIONAL VULNERABILITIES DURING EARLY IMPLEMENTATION IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
Association among Embryo culture, Cryopreservation and Birth defects in ART
Association among Embryo culture, Cryopreservation and Birth defects in ART
|
|
| 16:50 |
The efficiency of ART has improved the last years?
The efficiency of ART has improved the last years?
|
|
| 17:10 |
Is studying the metabolomic profile beneficial for fertility treatments?
Is studying the metabolomic profile beneficial for fertility treatments?
|
|
| 17:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
The moral status of the in vitro embryo: the view of clinical embryologists
The moral status of the in vitro embryo: the view of clinical embryologists
|
|
| 16:50 |
ni-PGT-A: the future yet?
ni-PGT-A: the future yet?
|
|
| 17:10 |
The impact of the embryo lab reducing mosaicism
The impact of the embryo lab reducing mosaicism
|
|
| 17:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 08:00 |
Is it more important the PGT or the physiology of implantation?
Is it more important the PGT or the physiology of implantation?
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 08:00 |
The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors
The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00 |
FROM OOCYTE TO STROLLER: CYCLE-LEVEL AI INTEGRATES OOCYTE COMPETENCE AND VITRIFIED EMBRYO VIABILITY TO PREDICT LIVE BIRTH PER RETRIEVAL AND ASSESS NEONATAL SAFETY IN FREEZE-ALL IVF
FROM OOCYTE TO STROLLER: CYCLE-LEVEL AI INTEGRATES OOCYTE COMPETENCE AND VITRIFIED EMBRYO VIABILITY TO PREDICT LIVE BIRTH PER RETRIEVAL AND ASSESS NEONATAL SAFETY IN FREEZE-ALL IVF
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether AI-derived oocyte competence (MAGENTA™) and embryo viability (KIDScore™) can be translated into cycle-level prediction of live birth per oocyte retrieval in freeze-all IVF cycles, and to investigate whether embryo-level AI signals are associated with perinatal outcomes among singleton live births. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included freeze-all IVF/ICSI retrieval cycles generating ≥1 vitrified embryo with available clinical follow-up. We applied a cycle-level embryo-stock framework aligned with real-world counseling in freeze-all care, where prognosis depends on the cohort of vitrified embryos produced per retrieval rather than on individual transfer events. Oocyte competence was summarized using an upper-tail cohort metric, defined as the 90th percentile of the MAGENTA™ score distribution within each retrieval (MAGENTA P90), capturing high-competence density while minimizing sensitivity to single-oocyte extremes. Embryo viability was summarized using the maximum KIDScore™ among vitrified embryos per retrieval (best vitrified embryo). The primary endpoint was ≥1 live birth per retrieval (LB/cycle). Secondary time-to-event endpoints included time to clinical pregnancy (TTP) and time to live birth (TLB). TTP was defined as the interval from retrieval to first clinical pregnancy following frozen embryo transfer (FET), censoring at last recorded FET date. TLB was defined as the interval from retrieval to delivery date when available, censoring at last recorded FET date; analyses were restricted to cycles with documented delivery dates. Models were adjusted for maternal age and number of mature (MII) oocytes, with patient-cluster robust inference. Perinatal outcomes were assessed among singleton live births and included birthweight, gestational age, neonatal length, sex, and congenital abnormalities. ResultsThe dataset included 2,183 cycles from 1,625 patients; 1,184 cycles had known live-birth follow-up and 1,758 produced ≥1 vitrified embryo. Oocyte AI → embryo stock: Per 1 SD increase in MAGENTA-P90, the number of vitrified embryos increased (IRR 1.51; 95% CI 1.44–1.59; p<0.001) and best vitrified-embryo KIDScore increased (+0.26 points; 95% CI 0.14–0.38; p=0.000017), adjusted for age and MII. Findings were consistent using maximum MAGENTA. Live birth per retrieval: In complete cases (N=895; 289 LB events), embryo viability independently predicted LB/cycle (maximum KIDScore OR 1.35 per SD; 95% CI 1.11–1.64; p=0.0027), whereas MAGENTA-P90 was not independently associated after accounting for KIDScore (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.85–1.19; p=0.97), supporting an upstream contribution of oocyte competence via embryo stock formation. Observed LB/cycle increased stepwise across maximum KIDScore quintiles: 21.5%, 25.3%, 32.0%, 40.5%, and 41.6% from Q1 to Q5. Model-based predicted probabilities showed a similar gradient (22.8% to 39.6%). Time-to-event outcomes: Among cycles contributing TTP data (N=1,035; 955 events), higher maximum KIDScore was associated with increased hazard of clinical pregnancy (HR 1.13 per SD; 95% CI 1.05–1.22; p=0.00063), whereas MAGENTA-P90 was not independently associated. In exploratory TLB analyses (N=572; 54 deliveries), maximum KIDScore predicted shorter time to live birth (HR 1.49 per SD; 95% CI 1.02–2.16; p=0.037). Perinatal outcomes: Among 283 singleton live births, mean birthweight was 3,104 g, gestational age 38.0 weeks, and length 47.9 cm. Adjusted birthweight increased by +75 g per SD of KIDScore (95% CI 21–130; p=0.0069), with no adverse perinatal signal. Congenital abnormalities were uncommon (5/235). ConclusionA cycle-level embryo-stock AI framework supports clinically actionable counseling in freeze-all IVF. Higher oocyte competence (MAGENTA upper-tail metric) is associated with greater embryo-stock quantity and quality, while the best vitrified-embryo KIDScore provides the strongest direct prognostic signal for live birth per retrieval, yielding clear and clinically interpretable probability gradients. Time-to-event analyses were directionally consistent, and perinatal outcomes among singleton births were reassuring, supporting effectiveness-oriented counseling integrated. |
|
| 09:10 |
CHOOSING THE TYPE OF PROGESTERONE FOR LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT IN NATURAL EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES.
CHOOSING THE TYPE OF PROGESTERONE FOR LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT IN NATURAL EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES.
Objective: To compare reproductive outcomes according to the type of progesterone used for luteal phase support in natural cycles undergoing single euploid blastocyst transfer. Methods: Retrospective, single-center observational study. A total of 281 single embryo transfer cycles involving good-quality blastocysts (grade 3 to 6, A/B), tested by PGT-A, performed between August 2021 and May 2025 were included. Patients were divided into three natural-cycle endometrial preparation groups according to the type of progesterone luteal phase support used: oral dydrogesterone (DYG), micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP), or a combination of both. Exclusion criteria were submucosal fibroids, endometrial polyps, intramural fibroids ≥ 5 cm, and hydrosalpinx identified by transvaginal ultrasound. Patients with regular cycles (21–35 days) underwent baseline and mid-follicular transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) to confirm a dominant follicle (≥14 mm). From that point, urinary LH testing was performed every 12h until detection of LH surge (LH+0). The presence of a corpus luteum was confirmed by TVU day LH + 2, as well as an endometrial thickness ≥ 7mm. Embryo transfer was LH +7 or P+5. Main Outcomes: Live birth, biochemical pregnancy (β-hCG), clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and neonatal birth weight. Analyses were performed using generalized linear models (GLM), and results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, embryo morphology, and endometriosis. IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 29.0, 2023) was used. Results: Descriptive analysis of the study groups using ANOVA and chi-square tests showed no statistically significant differences in age (p = 0.896), BMI (p = 0.195), neonatal birth weight at 37–38 weeks (p = 0.096), neonatal birth weight ≥ 39 weeks (p = 0.269), embryo morphology (p = 0.118), or presence of endometriosis (p = 0.489). The following outcome rates were observed in the DYG, MVP, and combined groups, respectively: biochemical pregnancy rate (64.5% vs. 47.1% vs. 61.6%), clinical pregnancy rate (61.2% vs. 43.7% vs. 57.5%), miscarriage rate (8.1% vs. 5.3% vs. 2.4%), and live birth rate (55.4% vs. 39.1% vs. 56.2%). The comparison of rates showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the dydrogesterone group compared to the MVP group for biochemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy (p = 0.014 and p = 0.015, respectively). GLM analysis demonstrated poorer outcomes in the MVP group for biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth (Table ). Conclusions: Oral dydrogesterone was associated with significantly higher live birth and pregnancy rates compared with micronized vaginal progesterone in natural euploid embryo transfer cycles. These findings suggest that the type of progesterone used for luteal phase support may directly impact reproductive outcomes and should be considered when optimizing natural cycle protocols.
Table Results of Generalized Linear Model Analyses for Outcomes
Note: OD = Odds ratio CI = Confidence Interval; p = Statistical Significance; R = Reference Values.Categorical variables (live birth, pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage) were expressed as odds ratios.All analyses were controlled for age, BMI, presence of endometriosis, and embryo morphology. |
KARINA ABELHA RABACO |
| 09:20 |
AGE-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF RECOMBINANT LH SUPPLEMENTATION ON AI-DERIVED OOCYTE COMPETENCE, EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND LIVE BIRTH
AGE-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF RECOMBINANT LH SUPPLEMENTATION ON AI-DERIVED OOCYTE COMPETENCE, EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND LIVE BIRTH
Objective To study whether recombinant LH (r-hLH) supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation improves AI-assessed oocyte competence, embryo morphokinetics, and ICSI outcomes, particularly according to maternal age. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 12,092 oocytes from 1,983 ICSI cycles analysed and categorised according to stimulation protocol: recombinant human FSH alone (r-hFSH; 414 cycles, 2,632 oocytes) or recombinant human FSH plus LH (r-hFSH + r-hLH; 1,569 cycles, 9,460 oocytes). To address baseline differences in maternal age between groups, propensity score overlap weighting was applied, generating a balanced pseudo-population with equivalent age distribution across stimulation protocols. Propensity scores were estimated in the overall cohort and within predefined age strata (<36 years, 36–38 years, >38 years) to enable age-specific comparisons. Treatment effects were further explored using continuous modelling with restricted cubic splines to evaluate potential non-linear age-dependent associations without relying exclusively on arbitrary cut-offs. Oocytes were evaluated prior to ICSI using the MAGENTA™ artificial intelligence platform to generate the MAGENTA™ Score (MS). Embryos were cultured in a time-lapse imaging system for morphokinetic assessment. Outcomes included MS, embryo morphokinetics, fertilization, blastulation, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates.
Results Across the overall cohort, LH supplementation was associated with faster early morphokinetic events, including shorter tPNf (23.95 vs. 23.46 h, p<0.001) and t2 (26.59 vs. 26.09 h, p<0.001) as well as higher fertilization (95.7% vs. 88.1%, p<0.001) and blastulation rates (55.0% vs. 51.3%, p=0.033). Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were comparable between groups; however, miscarriage was lower (7.0% vs. 12.2%, p=0.024) and live birth higher (54.5% vs. 48.5%, p=0.049) in r-hFSH + r-hLH cycles. In women <36 years, LH supplementation also accelerated some morphokinetic events, including shorter tPNf (23.22 vs. 23.99 h, p=0.015), t2 (25.81 vs. 26.57 h, p=0.017), t3 (36.44 vs. 37.22 h, p=0.028), t4 (37.96 vs. 39.01 h, p=0.012), t8 (57.69 vs. 59.20 h, p=0.047), tSB (99.32 vs. 101.43 h, p=0.045), and tB (107.69 vs. 110.53 h, p=0.040) and increased fertilization (95.2% vs. 90.9%, p=0.030). In the 36–38-year group, only fertilization differed (97.9% vs. 86.6%, p<0.001). In women >38 years, LH supplementation was associated with higher MS (5.91 vs. 5.71, p=0.044) and KIDScore (4.29 vs. 3.94, p=0.027), shorter tPNf (24.01 VS. 23.48 h, p=0.041) and t2 (26.62 vs. 26.01 h, p=0.049), higher fertilization (95.1% vs. 86.5%, p=0.016) and blastulation (50.8% vs. 43.0%, p<0.001), lower miscarriage (6.8% vs. 14.8%, p=0.045), and higher live birth (45.7% vs. 34.1%, p=0.015). Spline models confirmed significant age interactions for implantation (p=0.018), pregnancy (p=0.041), miscarriage (p=0.012), and live birth (p=0.009), demonstrating a progressive age-dependent benefit of LH supplementation. Conclusion Recombinant LH supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation appears to confer a clinically meaningful, age-dependent benefit. Beyond improving fertilization, blastulation, and embryo developmental dynamics, LH supplementation was associated with enhanced AI-derived markers of oocyte competence and improved reproductive outcomes in women of advanced maternal age. The age-interaction analyses reinforce that the magnitude of benefit increases progressively with advancing age, supporting a biologically coherent effect of LH in mitigating age-related reproductive decline. These findings suggest that integrating LH into stimulation protocols may represent a rational, mechanism-based strategy to optimise embryo competence and reduce pregnancy loss, particularly in women >38 years.
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00 |
Y CHROMOSOME HETEROCHROMATIN POLYMORPHISM (YQH+): IMPACT ON SPERMATOGENESIS AND ACCELERATED AGE-RELATED DECLINE
Y CHROMOSOME HETEROCHROMATIN POLYMORPHISM (YQH+): IMPACT ON SPERMATOGENESIS AND ACCELERATED AGE-RELATED DECLINE
Objective: Y chromosome heterochromatin polymorphisms (Yqh+ and Yqh-) are often considered benign variants, but their impact on male fertility remains controversial. This study aimed to compare seminal parameters between patients with 46,XY,Yqh+ polymorphisms and those men with normal karyotype (46,XY) to assess the risk of abnormal semen analysis in this variant, and to explore age-related effects on spermatogenesis in men carrying Yqh+. Methods: A retrospective comparative study from 242 infertile patients who underwent both karyotype and semen analysis was performed, without Y chromosome microdeletions. Patients were divided into two groups: control ( 46,XY; n=118) and (46,XY,Yqh+; n=124). Age, semen volume, pH, sperm concentration, total sperm count, normal morphology, vitality, round cells, leukocytes, DNA condensation, DNA fragmentation and seminal plasma biochemical markers were evaluated. Medians and interquartile ranges (25th-75th percentiles) were used, due to the non-normal distribution. Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables were used. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Significance was considered to be p < 0.05. Results: Age was similar between groups. Patients with 46,XY,Yqh+ had significantly lower median sperm concentration (p=0.011) and lower total sperm count (p=0.038) compared to control. The proportion of patients with concentration <16 M/mL was significantly higher in the 46,XY,Yqh+ group (24.7% vs 14.7%; OR=1.90; 95%CI 1.01-3.59; p=0.048); severe oligozoospermia (<5 M/mL) was also more frequent (9.6% vs 4.3%; OR=2.35; p=0.106); azoospermia was observed in 6.2% of Yqh+ group compared to 2.6% in the control group, representing a 2.4-fold increased risk, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.106).A negative correlation between age and sperm concentration was significant only in the Yqh+ group (rho=-0.20, p=0.021), and the decline with age was 3.4-fold higher than in controls (p for interaction=0.031). No significant differences were found in the other parameters assessed. The most clinically relevant parameters are summarized in Table. Conclusion: Y chromosome heterochromatin polymorphism (46,XY,Yqh+) was associated with a significant reduction in sperm concentration and total sperm count. The higher rate of azoospermia in the polymorphisms group highlights a clinically significant association with severe spermatogenic failure. Additionally, men with Y polymorphisms exhibited an age-related decline in sperm concentration, suggesting that the effects on spermatogenesis may intensify with advancing age. Our results challenge the traditional view of Yqh+ as a benign cytogenetic variant and support that the karyotype analysis should be part of the male infertility workup. |
VANESSA COZ |
| 09:10 |
IMPROVING HUMAN SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION BY MODIFYING CRYOPROTECTANT DILUTION AND THAWING TEMPERATURE
IMPROVING HUMAN SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION BY MODIFYING CRYOPROTECTANT DILUTION AND THAWING TEMPERATURE
Objective: Semen cryopreservation is a cornerstone for fertility preservation and assisted reproductive medicine, and post-thaw quality is a critical determinant of clinical success. Commercially available cryoprotectants containing egg yolk and glycerol are widely used to protect sperm plasma membranes during freezing. This study aimed to optimize the human semen cryopreservation protocol by performing paired, within-ejaculate comparisons of different cryoprotectant concentrations and thawing temperatures.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted using semen samples from 15 volunteer donors. All donors provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the institutional review board. After liquefaction, baseline motility, vitality, and concentration were assessed. Each ejaculate was divided into aliquots and mixed with a commercial egg-yolk glycerol (EYG) cryoprotectant to achieve three final glycerol concentrations: 6% (1:2 dilution; manufacturer-recommended standard), 4% (1:3), and 3% (1:4). After 4 minutes, samples were held at -14°C for 20 minutes, placed in nitrogen vapor (~-80°C) for 20 minutes, and stored in liquid nitrogen. After ≥48 hours, all dilutions were initially thawed at 37°C to identify the optimal dilution based on post-thaw progressive motility. Using this selected dilution, additional aliquots were thawed at 37°C (standard), 42°C, and 47°C. Cryoprotectant was removed by two-step dilution with a pre-warmed medium followed by centrifugation (300×g, 7 minutes), and endpoints were measured immediately. The primary endpoint was progressive motility. Secondary endpoints included vitality (eosin), intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) by dihydroethidium (DHE) fluorescence, and DNA fragmentation by TUNEL (fluorescein-based assay). ROS and TUNEL values were transformed to (1 - value) where higher scores indicate better preservation. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests per parameter, random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird) integrating 20 paired comparisons across all parameters, hierarchical Bayesian inference for posterior probabilities of improvement, and global quality index analysis. Differences were defined statistically significant at p<0.05 (two-tailed), with effect sizes as Cohen's d.
Results: In dilution screening (37°C thaw), 1:3 showed the best post-thaw recovery and was selected for optimization; the manufacturer-recommended 1:2 performed less favorably, while 1:4 yielded the poorest outcomes. Using 1:3 for temperature testing, 42°C thawing produced the highest progressive motility and vitality, whereas 47°C resulted in inferior parameters. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated significant global benefit favoring the optimized protocol (EYG 1:3 + 42°C) over the standard (EYG 1:2 + 37°C) (d=+0.336; 95% CI: +0.016 to +0.656; p=0.040). Progressive motility showed the largest improvement (d=+0.725; 95% CI: +0.21 to +1.24; p=0.006). DNA fragmentation (1-TUNEL) and ROS (1-ROS) showed positive trends (d=+0.308 and d=+0.132, respectively), while vitality remained comparable (d=+0.064). Heterogeneity was low (I²=25.1%). Our optimized protocol indicates a 98.9% probability of overall superiority through Bayesian analysis. Fifty percent of samples showed clear improvement across most parameters, with biological coherence between enhanced motility and reduced oxidative stress. No adverse effects on viability were detected. The 1:4 dilution and thawing at 47°C produced inferior results compared to both standard and optimized protocols.
Conclusions: The optimized protocol (EYG 1:3 with 42°C thawing) showed statistically significant global superiority over the standard protocol. Progressive motility exhibited the greatest enhancement, and there were also favorable trends in lower oxidative stress and DNA fragmentation. This protocol reduced cryoprotectant consumption by 33% and shortened handling time, and the 42°C thawing temperature shortened handling time, improving laboratory efficiency and resource utilization while maintaining or enhancing post-thaw sperm quality. |
Sofía Michele Núñez Santacruz |
| 09:20 |
CHROMOSOMAL ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING AFTER MISCARRIAGE FOLLOWING EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER
CHROMOSOMAL ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING AFTER MISCARRIAGE FOLLOWING EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER
OBJECTIVES: The transfer of euploid embryos selected through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) does not completely eliminate the risk of miscarriage. Analysis of products of conception (POC) after miscarriage following euploid embryo transfer may be essential to identify underlying causes and improve reproductive counseling. The objective of this study was to evaluate the chromosomal constitution of POCs from spontaneous miscarriages occurring after the transfer of embryos previously classified as euploid by PGT-A.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 110 POC samples from miscarriages following the transfer of euploid embryos confirmed by PGT-A between April 2021 and Jan 2026. Samples were obtained by aspiration or curettage between 4 and 18 weeks of gestation. For each case, three representative samples of fetal tissue or chorionic villi were selected. Low-coverage next-generation sequencing (NGS) was conducted. Ion ReproSeq™ PGS kit was used for library preparation, Ion Chef™ and Ion S5 System instruments for sequencing and Ion Reporter software for data analysis (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A proprietary bioinformatics pipeline (v2.0) was used for the analysis of 24-chromosome aneuploidies and partial duplication/deletions (≥10Mb). Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was performed to detect maternal cell contamination and ploidy abnormalities.
RESULTS: Fetal tissue was successfully recovered in 87.3% of samples (96/110), while 12.7% (14/110) showed maternal cell contamination. The mean maternal age was 38.2 years. Among the 96 samples with informative results, 92 POCs corresponded to euploid embryos (95.8%), consistent with the PGT-A result. Aneuploidies were identified in 2 cases (2.1%), one with trisomy 9 and the other one with monosomy X (45,X). Further analysis of distinct chorionic villi samples from this last case confirmed X chromosome mosaicism: one specimen demonstrated monosomy X(45,X), whereas another showed a normal female karyotype (46,XX), with maternal cell contamination excluded by STR analysis. Ploidy abnormalities were detected in another 2 cases (2.1%), including one triploidy XXX and one tetraploidy XXXX. It is well established that conventional PGT-A sequencing has limitations in detecting ploidy abnormalities. In our cohort, 1.0% of the 96 informative cases might have been identified using SNP-based PGT-A methodologies, which enable a more accurate assessment of the ploidy status. These findings demonstrate a high concordance between embryonic genetic diagnosis and fetal chromosomal constitution, consistent with the embryonic mosaicism rate observed in our PGT-A cases (~6%). Sex chromosome alterations were the abnormalities most frequently associated with fetal mosaicism.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of analyzing POCs after miscarriage, even following the transfer of euploid embryos, to accurately characterize the underlying causes of pregnancy loss. This is particularly relevant in cases where ploidy analysis using SNP-based methodologies has not been performed and also reinforces the advice for PGT-A approaches, including ploidy testing. Comprehensive POC analysis is essential for reproductive counseling, helping to differentiate sporadic events from potential recurrence risks. Advances in PGT-A methodology may improve diagnostic accuracy through enhanced detection of ploidy abnormalities. Continued investigation into post-zygotic genetic alterations and incorporation of advanced genomic technologies may further improve diagnostic precision and clinical management. |
DANIELA LORENZI |
Addressed to: Gynecological physicians interested in minimally invasive gynecological surgery, specialists in AR and advanced residents.
Course objective: To train surgical skills in laparoscopy and applied to gynecology and infertility; to practice basic, intermediate and advanced techniques in simulators and biological models; to promote academic exchange among Latin American specialists.
Contents: Laparoscopic techniques, ergonomics, knots, etc.; technological innovations in reproductive surgery.
Benefits: Official certification of participation; networking with regional leaders in reproductive surgery.

| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 10:00 |
How to optimize the best results in embryonic genetic analysis: a view from the laboratory
How to optimize the best results in embryonic genetic analysis: a view from the laboratory
La tecnología de secuenciación de nueva generación (NGS) transforma la jornada reproductiva al permitir análisis genéticos altamente precisos incluso con cantidades mínimas de muestra, aumentando la confiabilidad de los resultados. En este contexto, las pruebas genéticas preimplantacionales (PGT) se vuelven fundamentales para orientar decisiones clínicas más acertadas en reproducción asistida. Al posibilitar la selección de embriones con mayor potencial de éxito, estas soluciones genéticas integrales elevan la personalización y la seguridad de los tratamientos. Para ello, la biopsia embrionaria asume un papel crítico, garantizando la calidad y representatividad de la muestra analizada. |

| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
No trade-offs on safety: the value of electronic witnessing in assisted reproduction
No trade-offs on safety: the value of electronic witnessing in assisted reproduction
|
||
|
Optimization of Sperm Selection using ZyMot 850: Clinical Experience
Optimization of Sperm Selection using ZyMot 850: Clinical Experience
|

| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 10:30 |
Aplicación clínica del estudio del microbioma reproductivo en reproducción asistida
Aplicación clínica del estudio del microbioma reproductivo en reproducción asistida
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 11:00 |
Double stim in poor prognosis patient
Double stim in poor prognosis patient
|
|
| 11:20 |
ESHRE guideline: Ovarian stimulation for IVF and ICSI
ESHRE guideline: Ovarian stimulation for IVF and ICSI
|
|
| 11:40 |
Dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger for elective fertility preservation
Dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger for elective fertility preservation
|
|
| 12:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 11:00 |
ICSI with Testicular Sperm in Non-Azoospermic Men: Expert Opinion and Practical Algorithm
ICSI with Testicular Sperm in Non-Azoospermic Men: Expert Opinion and Practical Algorithm
|
|
| 11:20 |
Stem cell and gene therapies: FDA-approved already and prospects beyond 2026
Stem cell and gene therapies: FDA-approved already and prospects beyond 2026
|
|
| 11:40 |
The future of embryo selection in the lab
The future of embryo selection in the lab
|
|
| 12:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Artificial vs Natural FET. Should we go back to nature for all?
Artificial vs Natural FET. Should we go back to nature for all?
|
|
| 14:20 |
Individualised luteal phase for cryotransfer
Individualised luteal phase for cryotransfer
|
|
| 14:40 |
The future of implantation studies
The future of implantation studies
|
|
| 15:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 14:00 |
Gametes and embryos obtained from stem cells
Gametes and embryos obtained from stem cells
|
|
| 14:20 |
Automation in the Lab
Automation in the Lab
|
|
| 14:40 |
From the Lab to the algorithm: disruptive innovation in AR with AI and Data Science
From the Lab to the algorithm: disruptive innovation in AR with AI and Data Science
|
|
| 15:00 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Addressed to: Gynecological physicians interested in minimally invasive gynecological surgery, specialists in AR and advanced residents.
Course objective: To train surgical skills in laparoscopy and applied to gynecology and infertility; to practice basic, intermediate and advanced techniques in simulators and biological models; to promote academic exchange among Latin American specialists.
Contents: Laparoscopic techniques, ergonomics, knots, etc.; technological innovations in reproductive surgery.
Benefits: Official certification of participation; networking with regional leaders in reproductive surgery.
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Group 4
Group 4
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 15:30 |
AI in reproductive medicine
AI in reproductive medicine
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 15:30 |
The future of the Genetics Laboratory
The future of the Genetics Laboratory
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 16:30 |
ILLUMINATING THE BLACK BOX OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY: AN AI-DERIVED ULTRASOUND SCORE PREDICTS CLINICAL PREGNANCY AFTER FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER
ILLUMINATING THE BLACK BOX OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY: AN AI-DERIVED ULTRASOUND SCORE PREDICTS CLINICAL PREGNANCY AFTER FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)–derived score from transvaginal endometrial ultrasound images, combined with clinical parameters, can predict clinical pregnancy (CP) following frozen embryo transfer (FET), addressing the persistent challenge of objective endometrial receptivity assessment in Assisted Reproductive Technology. METHODS: This retrospective study included 176 FET cycles from 123 women treated between 2022 and 2024 at a university affiliated IVF center. As per clinical workflow, transvaginal sagittal endometrium ultrasound images were obtained on the day of exogenous progesterone initiation or luteinizing hormone surge in medicated and natural FET cycles, respectively. Together with patient age and recorded endometrial thickness, images were analyzed using a novel Endometrium-AI model. The AI model generates a continuous score (0 to 10), with higher scores indicating a greater predicted probability of CP. Scores were stratified into four predefined intervals (0–2.5, 2.6–5.0, 5.1–7.5, and 7.6–10.0) to assess dose-response relationship with CP outcomes. The primary outcome was CP, defined as the presence of a gestational sac and/or fetal heartbeat at 7 weeks’ gestation on ultrasound. Discriminatory performance was evaluated using ROC analysis (AUC, sensitivity, specificity). Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical variables using the chi-square test. Associations between Endometrium-AI score categories and clinical pregnancy were evaluated using univariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the independent predictive value of the Endometrium-AI score after adjustment for the number of good-quality embryos transferred and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) status. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 37.3 ± 5.8 years (range 21–51). Most cycles were medicated (n = 151), with a mean endometrial thickness of 9.07 ± 1.60 mm. The overall CP rate was 65.3% (115/176). Good quality embryos were transferred in 141 cycles, including 91 single and 50 double embryo transfers; of which, 62 cycles (35.2%) involved euploid embryos confirmed by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). The Endometrium-AI model demonstrated modest discriminatory performance (AUC 0.62; sensitivity 0.58; specificity 0.63). However, mean Endometrium-AI scores were significantly higher in cycles resulting in CP compared with non-CP cycles (3.99 ± 2.53 vs. 2.96 ± 2.35, p<0.001), and CP rates increased across Endometrium-AI score categories: 54.9% (0–2.5; n = 71), 65.5% (2.6–5.0; n = 55), 83.3% (5.1–7.5; n = 30), and 75.0% (7.6–10; n = 20) (p<0.05). Compared with the lowest category (0–2.5), patients scoring 5.1–7.5 had 4.1-fold higher odds of CP (OR 4.10, 95% CI 1.51–13.25). No statistically significant differences were observed for OR in the scores of 2.6–5.0 (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.76–3.25) or 7.6–10.0 (OR 2.46, 95% CI 0.85–8.23). After adjustment for the number of good-quality embryos transferred and PGT-A status, associations remained significant for scores of 5.1–7.5 (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.46–15.20) and 7.6–10.0 (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.09–14.71), indicating independent predictive value beyond embryo quality. CONCLUSION: Although overall discriminative performance for predicting CP following FET was modest, higher Endometrium-AI score categories were independently associated with significantly increased odds of CP, even after adjustments for key embryonic variables. These findings suggest that AI-based analysis of transvaginal endometrial ultrasound images may provide clinically meaningful information beyond conventional measurements such as endometrial thickness, thereby contributing independently to CP success. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted to confirm generalizability and refine predictive thresholds. With further validation, Endometrium-AI has the potential to integrate into routine endometrial assessment as a standardized, non-invasive decision-support tool in FET cycles. |
|
| 16:40 |
ADJUNCTIVE INTERVENTIONS IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: THE NEED FOR ENHANCED INFORMED CONSENT IN FERTILITY "ADD-ONS"
ADJUNCTIVE INTERVENTIONS IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: THE NEED FOR ENHANCED INFORMED CONSENT IN FERTILITY "ADD-ONS"
Objective: Methods: Results: Adjunctive fertility interventions are frequently presented as potential success-enhancing strategies, particularly in emotionally complex clinical scenarios. However, interviews revealed that most professionals do not employ reinforced, intervention-specific consent forms when offering these therapies. Standard IVF consent documentation is commonly used without explicit disclosure regarding:
Importantly, interview data indicate that a substantial proportion of professionals are unaware of the ethical and legal requirement to implement enhanced informed consent when performing off-label or non-standard interventions. This omission does not appear to stem from deliberate concealment but from the widespread perception that general IVF consent is sufficient to cover adjunctive practices. However, failure to provide reinforced disclosure may constitute a breach of the enhanced duty of information required for non-standard therapeutic interventions. Jurisprudence in several Latin American jurisdictions has consistently held that deficiencies in informed consent may constitute autonomous medical malpractice, even when the technical medical act itself was properly executed. Consequently, inadequate disclosure of experimental status, uncertain efficacy, or specific risks significantly increases medico-legal exposure for both practitioners and institutions. In emotionally charged fertility contexts, patients may interpret adjunctive interventions as clinically endorsed strategies that meaningfully increase success rates. Absence of reinforced documentation amplifies the risk of litigation in cases of unsuccessful outcomes or lack of measurable benefit. Enhanced informed consent for adjunctive fertility interventions should therefore include: explicit disclosure of evidentiary limitations; clarification of off-label or non-standard status; individualized clinical justification; transparent risk–benefit analysis; acknowledgment of variable response; financial transparency; discussion of alternatives; and documented autonomous decision-making following adequate reflection time. Conclusion: Keywords: assisted reproduction; fertility add-ons; platelet-rich plasma; off-label use; enhanced informed consent; medical malpractice; clinical risk management.
|
Paula Siverino Bavio |
| 16:50 |
OVARIAN RESILIENCE AND EMBRYONIC COMPETENCE IN OOCYTE DONORS: A RETROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF 1 TO 6 CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION CYCLES
OVARIAN RESILIENCE AND EMBRYONIC COMPETENCE IN OOCYTE DONORS: A RETROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF 1 TO 6 CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION CYCLES
Objective The expansion of oocyte donation programs has raised concerns about the potential cumulative effect of repeated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles on functional ovarian reserve and oocyte quality in young donors. Available evidence is limited and heterogeneous, particularly in Latin American populations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of up to six consecutive COS cycles on the number of mature oocytes (MII), blastulation rate, and production of high-quality blastocysts in an oocyte donation program. Methods This retrospective longitudinal study analyzed 738 oocyte donation cycles performed between 2021 and 2026 in healthy donors aged 18–32 years, with body mass index (BMI) 18.5–27 kg/m² and normal ovarian reserve. Each donor contributed between 1 and 6 COS cycles. All donors underwent individualized short antagonist protocols with gonadotropin doses ranging from 150–300 IU/day and final oocyte maturation triggered by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (0.2 mg). Oocyte pickup was performed 36 hours post-trigger, followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using frozen semen samples. Primary outcome measures included the number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle, total number of blastocysts, number of high-quality blastocysts (≥3AA/AB/BA/BB on days 5–6), and an efficiency ratio defined as high-quality blastocysts per MII oocyte. Comparisons across the six donation cycles were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Quantitative oocyte yield remained stable across the six COS cycles, with mean MII oocyte counts ranging from 19 to 21 per cycle and no significant differences between cycle groups (p=0.654). The number of blastocysts obtained (approximately 7–8 per cycle) and the number of high-quality blastocysts (approximately 4–5 per cycle) also showed no statistically significant variation (p=0.981 and p=0.892, respectively). The efficiency ratio ranged from 17.4% in the sixth cycle to 22.8% in the fifth cycle; the slight numerical decrease in the sixth cycle did not reach statistical significance and is consistent with expected biological variability in a smaller subgroup (n=15). The incidence of moderate–severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and cycle cancellation was low and did not increase in later cycles. Table 1: Efficiency metrics across donation cycles. P-values: MII (p=0.654), Total Blastocysts (p=0.981), Top Embryos (p=0.892), Kruskal–Wallis test. Conclusion Repeated COS up to six cycles was not associated with measurable deterioration in functional ovarian reserve or embryonic competence, as assessed by MII oocyte yield, blastocyst formation, and blastocyst morphological quality. These findings support the safety and effectiveness of repeated oocyte donation within a six-cycle limit and provide local evidence aligned with current international recommendations. The stability of outcomes across multiple cycles suggests that young donors with normal ovarian reserve can safely undergo repeated stimulation without compromising oocyte quality or developmental potential. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to evaluate potential long-term effects on donor reproductive health. |
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
Electronic witnessing as a tool for clinical excellence
Electronic witnessing as a tool for clinical excellence
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 17:00 |
Psychological evaluation of the donors
Psychological evaluation of the donors
|
|
| 17:20 |
How does Assisted Reproduction help to build new family models?
How does Assisted Reproduction help to build new family models?
|
|
| 17:40 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 08:30 |
Algorithms that give life: How AI, Technology Watch and Data Analysis are transforming Assisted Reproduction
Algorithms that give life: How AI, Technology Watch and Data Analysis are transforming Assisted Reproduction
|
|
| 08:50 |
Can REDLARA rescue biomedical sciences in the North?
Can REDLARA rescue biomedical sciences in the North?
|
|
| 09:10 |
Clinical use of exosome therapy in patients with diminished ovarian reserve: results and therapeutic protocols
Clinical use of exosome therapy in patients with diminished ovarian reserve: results and therapeutic protocols
|
|
| 09:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 10:30 |
Conception and misconceptions
Conception and misconceptions
|
|
| 10:50 |
Individualized ovarian stimulation
Individualized ovarian stimulation
|
|
| 11:10 |
Preimplantation Genetic Testing
Preimplantation Genetic Testing
|
|
| 11:30 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
| Time | Presentation title | Speaker/Authors |
|---|---|---|
| 12:00 |
Implantation Failure: Anatomical Causes
Implantation Failure: Anatomical Causes
|
|
| 12:20 |
What to do in cases of implantation failure with euploid embryos
What to do in cases of implantation failure with euploid embryos
|
|
| 12:40 |
Discussion
Discussion
|
Médico e pesquisador do Centro de Reprodução Humana Prof. Franco Jr., em Ribeirão Preto, Brasil.
Editor-Chefe do JBRA Assisted Reproduction.
Director de Embriología de los Laboratorios Huntington de Brasil
Maestría en Ginecología por la Universidad Federal Paulista - UNIFESP
| How to optimize business success, quality, and personalized experiences? | 15:00 |
|---|
| AI in oocytes selection | 11:00 |
|---|
| The future of embryo selection in the lab | 11:40 |
|---|
| How to optimize the best results in embryonic genetic analysis: a view from the laboratory | 10:00 |
|---|
Bacharel em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade de Minas Gerais – UFMG; Mestre em Morfologia pela Universidade de Minas Gerais – UFMG; Doutora em Biologia Celular pela Universidade de Minas Gerais – UFMG / Université de Rennes 1- França; Especialista em Embriologia Clínica – CRB-4; Título de Capacitação em Reprodução Assistida pela Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Assistida – SBRA; Diretora em Fertitech - Tecnologia em Reprodução Assistida; Embriologista Sênior em Cegonha Medicina Reprodutiva; Diretora-fundadora do Prónucleo - Associação Brasileira em Medicina Reprodutiva; Sócia-Proprietária em Cegonha Medicina Reprodutiva; autora do Código de Ética do Pronúcleo - Associação Brasileira em Medicina Reprodutiva; Diretora fundadora em ABRAFE – Associação Brasileira de Apoio à Fertilidade. Especialista em Gestão da Qualidade e Auditoria interna em Saúde. Pesquisadora em projetos junto a UFMG.
| Gamete compatibility: a critical choice for oocyte selection? | 14:00 |
|---|
Licenciado en Ciencias Biológicas
Maestria em Bioquímica
Maestria en Gestión de Servicios de Salud
Doctorado en Bioquímica
Doctorado en Ciencias de la Salud
Director de Laboratorio de Fertilia, Tucumán, Argentina.
| Sperm and its source: Does it change the Assisted Reproduction? | 14:30 |
|---|
| Fragmentation, diagnosis and treatment in men. | 16:50 |
|---|
| The impact of the embryo lab reducing mosaicism | 17:10 |
|---|
Fellowship em Medicina da Reprodução - Instituto Dexeus -BarcelonaDiretor e fundador da Genesis - Brasília-DFMembro da Camara Tecnica de RA do Conselho Federal de Medicina
| Double stim in poor prognosis patient | 11:00 |
|---|
| Is it more important the PGT or the physiology of implantation? | 08:00 |
|---|
Maestría en Fisiología Endócrina por le UFRJ (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro).
Especialista en Reproducción Asistida por SBRA/REDLARA/FEBRASGO.
Coordinador de residencia médica en Ginecología por el HUCFF-UFRJ.
Director de la SBRA y de la Sociedad de Giinecoloía y Obstetricia de Rio de Janeiro.
Director médico de Fertipraxis - Centro de Reproducción Humana.
Coordinador del Curso Clínico de Alta Complejidad - PEC Online - REDLARA.
| Implementation failure: where is it, how to overcome it? | 17:00 | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking to the specialists | 18:00 |
| CHOOSING THE TYPE OF PROGESTERONE FOR LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT IN NATURAL EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES. | 09:10 |
|---|
| ESHRE guideline: Ovarian stimulation for IVF and ICSI | 11:20 |
|---|
| REPRODUCIBILITY OF A COMMERCIAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SCORE FOR OOCYTE QUALITY | 00:00 |
|---|
| Y CHROMOSOME HETEROCHROMATIN POLYMORPHISM (YQH+): IMPACT ON SPERMATOGENESIS AND ACCELERATED AGE-RELATED DECLINE | 09:00 | |
|---|---|---|
| IMPROVING HUMAN SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION BY MODIFYING CRYOPROTECTANT DILUTION AND THAWING TEMPERATURE | 09:10 |
Director de Laboratorio de la clínica Fertilitat- Centro de Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre-RS - Brasil.
Director de REDLARA Región Brasil
Acreditador de REDLARA
Ex-coordinador del Comité de Acreditación de REDLARA
Ex Presidente del Pronúcleo
Médico Veterinario por la UFPEL
Maestría en Fisiología de la Reproducción, UFRGRS
Doctorado en Texas A&M University
| Secondary infertility related to Istchmocele: Current perspectives in reproductive surgery | 14:40 |
|---|
| Implantation Failure: Anatomical Causes | 12:00 |
|---|
Embriólogo y Director Científico especializado en Medicina Reproductiva. Actualmente lidera la estrategia científica en Pregna Medicina Reproductiva (Buenos Aires) y se desempeña como consultor estratégico para diversos centros de fertilidad en Argentina. Su experiencia trasciende fronteras como asesor del Fondo Nacional de Recursos (FNR) para Reproducción Asistida en Uruguay, donde contribuye al desarrollo de políticas y estándares de calidad en la región.
| Is it more important the PGT or the physiology of implantation? | 08:00 |
|---|
Diretora da FERTIPRAXIS Centro de Reproducao Humana.
Prof Adjunta, Doutora, da UFRJ, Membro da Comissão Nacional Especializada em Reprodução Assistida da FEBRASGO.
Membro do Conselho Consultivo da SBRA.
Ex Presidente da REDLARA.
| Biology and psychological impact: discourses, communication and decision-making in gamete donation | 16:30 |
|---|
| CHOOSING THE TYPE OF PROGESTERONE FOR LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT IN NATURAL EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES. | 09:10 |
|---|
| How does Assisted Reproduction help to build new family models? | 17:20 |
|---|
Doutor em Urologia pela UNIFESP
Doutor em Ginecologia pela UNESP
Coordenador do Curso de Pós-graduação em Reprodução Humana do Instituto Sapientiae
Diretor Científico do FERTGROUP
| How does the male factor affect embryonic development? | 17:10 |
|---|
| Changes in Latin America are knocking at the door. | 14:00 |
|---|
| From Double Helix to Double Trouble: Sperm DNA Fragmentation Unveiled - A Reproductive Urologist Perspective | 14:00 |
|---|
| FROM OOCYTE TO STROLLER: CYCLE-LEVEL AI INTEGRATES OOCYTE COMPETENCE AND VITRIFIED EMBRYO VIABILITY TO PREDICT LIVE BIRTH PER RETRIEVAL AND ASSESS NEONATAL SAFETY IN FREEZE-ALL IVF | 09:00 | |
|---|---|---|
| AGE-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF RECOMBINANT LH SUPPLEMENTATION ON AI-DERIVED OOCYTE COMPETENCE, EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND LIVE BIRTH | 09:20 |
| ILLUMINATING THE BLACK BOX OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY: AN AI-DERIVED ULTRASOUND SCORE PREDICTS CLINICAL PREGNANCY AFTER FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER | 16:30 |
|---|
| The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors | 08:00 |
|---|
Médico Ginecólogo, Especialista en Medicina Reproductiva.
Miembro de PROAR (Programa de Asistencia Reproductiva de Rosario-Argentina).
Director REDLARA Región Sur.
| Intramural fibroids and IVF. When to operate and when not to | 14:20 |
|---|
Designation: Director of the IVF and PGT laboratories IVI Madrid
Board of Directors of the Spanish Association of Reproductive Biology
Máster Universitario en Biología y Tecnología Aplicada a la Reproducción Humana Asistida-Module III coordinator: Genetics and Health Medicine (Since 2017).
Genetic Reproduction Interest Group, SEF, since 2019
ESHRE PGT Consortium Steering Committee, since 2019
Professor at Universidad Complutense de Madrid, since 2022
Reviewer: Human Fertility, RBM Online, Fertility & Sterility. Reviewer, Molecular Human Reproduction, Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online Top Reviewer 2023.
| PGT: yes! | 17:00 |
|---|
| Preimplantation Genetic Testing | 11:10 |
|---|
Psicóloga na Clínica Huntington Pró-Criar. -Especialista em Psicologia em Reprodução Assistida pela SBRA. Especialista em Psicologia Médica pela UFMG. Especialista em Psicanálise e Hospital, pela Clínica de Psicologia e Psicanálise do Hospital Mater Dei. Doutoranda em Psicologia pela USAL.
| Donor evaluation. Research-based updates | 17:00 |
|---|
Bruno Coprerski é atualmente o Chief Operation Officer LATAM da Centogene. Atua há mais de 10 anos na área de genética reprodutiva, em sua experiência anterior atuou em grandes laboratórios do Brasil. Tem experiência em Diagnóstico Genético Pré-implantação (PGD/PGT-M e PGT-SR) e Triagem Genética Pré-implantação (PGS/PGT-A), Triagem de Portadores, Sequenciamento de DNA e Biologia Molecular. Participou da implantação de diferentes laboratórios no Brasil, Estados Unidos, México e Espanha.
| Use of Genetic Panels in Couples, Donors and Recipients | 15:30 |
|---|
| PGT-A Today: New Technologies and Clinical Benefit | 16:30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion of clinical cases | 17:30 |
| ni-PGT-A: the future yet? | 16:50 |
|---|
Embriólogo humano. Certificado por REDLARA, Sociedad Argentina de Medicina Reproductiva (Samer) y Sociedad Argentina de Embriología Clínica (SAEC)
Miembro de la comisión de acreditación de REDLARA .
Vice director REDLARA Región Caribe y Centroamérica.
| Retrograde ejaculation, advances in technique. | 14:20 |
|---|
| The key to success in Assisted Reproduction: how quality indicators and efficiency can make all the difference | 17:00 |
|---|
Ginecologista especializado em Cirurgia Vídeo- endoscópica e Reprodução Humana pela FEBRASGO; mestre e doutor em medicina reprodutiva pela FMABC; Professor Associado da Disciplina de Saúde Sexual, Reprodutiva e Genética Populacional da FMABC; Vice-diretor Brasil da Red Latinoamericana de Reproduccion Asistida (REDLARA); Vice-Presidente da Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Assistida (SBRA); presidente do CBRA 2025; Diretor clínico do Instituto Ideia Fértil de Medicina Reprodutiva e das clínicas Embryo Genesis e W.IN.
| The immunology of implantation: is the soil prepared? | 16:30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking to the specialists | 18:00 |
| Hysteroscopy in cesarian scar pregnancy treatment | 14:00 |
|---|
| The future of implantation studies | 14:40 |
|---|
Instrumentadora Quirúrgica, otorgado por la Universidad de Buenos aires, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín (año 1981).
Antecedentes Profesionales:
Jefa de Quirófano de CEGyR Medicina y Genética Reproductiva Grupo Eugin
Miembro de la Sociedad Argentina de Medicina Reproductiva (SAMeR)
Coordinadora de talleres para Instrumentadoras y Enfermeras SAMeR
Directora del Curso anual para Enfermeras e Instrumentadoras SAMeR
Miembro de ALMER Asociación Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida
Docente de la Escuela de Capacitación de la RED Peruana de Asesoras Reproductivas
Integrante de la Comisión de Enfermería en Reproducción Asistida de REDLARA
Docente del PEC ON LINE para enfermería de la REDLARA
Miembro de la Comisión de Enfermería de la Federación Internacional de Sociedades de Fertilidad (IFFS)
| What does the endometrium tell us today? Endometrial receptivity/microbiota test. Educational role of healthcare professionals in A.R. | 15:00 |
|---|
El Dr. David Cotán Marín, Licenciado en Ambientales y Doctor en Biotecnología
(UPO), es un referente en biotecnología y biomedicina. Como CEO de Pronacera
lidera investigaciones de alto impacto en biología molecular y medicina aplicada.
Con más de 50 publicaciones en el ámbito de la salud reproductiva y el estudio del
microbioma, impulsa proyectos pioneros en fertilidad y medicina personalizada.
Investigador activo y ponente internacional, su enfoque interdisciplinar se centra en
el desarrollo de herramientas diagnósticas innovadoras basadas en la microbiota.
------
Dr. David Cotán Marín, BSc in Environmental Sciences and PhD in Biotechnology
(UPO), is a key opinion leader in biotechnology and biomedicine. As CEO of
Pronacera, he promotes high -impact research in molecular biology and applied
medicine.
With over 50 publications in reproductive health and microbiome studies, he drives
pioneering projects in fertility and personalized medicine. An active researcher and
international speaker, his interdisciplinary approach focuses on developing
innovative microbiota -based diagnostic tools.
| Is studying the metabolomic profile beneficial for fertility treatments? | 17:10 |
|---|
| Aplicación clínica del estudio del microbioma reproductivo en reproducción asistida | 10:30 |
|---|
Bachiller en Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú
Doctorado en Biología Celular y Molecular de la Universidad de Chile en el año 1999.
Director del Laboratorio de la UMR de Clínica Las Condes.
Fundador y miembro del Comité Acreditador de REDLARA.
Asesor y co-director del Registro Latino Americano de Reproducción Asistida.
| New patients data identification system | 19:30 |
|---|
| The efficiency of ART has improved the last years? | 16:50 |
|---|
| The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors | 08:00 |
|---|
Certificado Internacional en Andrología Clínica (2025 – 2029), Red Latinoamérica de Reproducción Asistida (REDLARA) y PEC Online en Embriología Clínica.
Posgrado en Genética Médica › Instituto de Medicina Genómica y Univ. Valencia, España.
Maestría en Ciencias, Facultad de Ciencias, U.N.A.M.
Biología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores, Zaragoza, U.N.A.M.
Formación en Andrología, Banco de Semen y Pruebas Especiales › IVI Valencia - IVI México).
Certificado en Análisis de Semen por la ESHRE, Oporto, Portugal.
Actualización en “Banco de Semen y Tejido Testicular”, (ESHRE), Granada, España.
Andrólogo – Embriólogo, Responsable de Laboratorio de Andrología, Banco de Semen, Calidad e Investigación › Hisparep, Clínica de Reproducción Asistida, Hospital Español.
Director de Proyectos de Investigación, Tesis de Licenciatura y Posgrado, UNAM, UAM, UAG, IPN, UAG.
Tutor del PEC Online de Embriología Clínica y Clínicos, REDLARA.
Revisor de artículos. Revista Mexicana de Medicina de la Reproducción A.C. (AMMR); International Journal of Fertility & Sterility (Int J Fertil & Esteril); JBRA Assisted Reproduction; Archives of Medical Research.
| What tests to perform on seminal plasma (Ideal routine) | 14:00 |
|---|
Médico Ginecólogo Especialista en medicina reproductiva.
Director del Centro de Esterilidad Montevideo en Uruguay.
| The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors | 08:00 |
|---|
Es máster en familia y nuevas tecnologías con énfasis en terapia familiar por la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. También es máster en terapia de familia y pareja por la Universidad Pontificia de Comillas, Madrid, España. Es licenciada en Psicología, Universidad Latina de Panamá. Está formada en meaning-Centered Psychotherapy Training Certificate the department of Psychiatry and behavioural sciences of Memorial Sloan Kettering cáncer center, NYC. Cuenta con más de 15 años de trayectoria en el acompañamiento psicológico de personas, parejas y familias en procesos de infertilidad, reproducción asistida, embarazo y duelo reproductivo e intervención en contextos de alta carga emocional, desde un enfoque integral, sistémico y basado en evidencia científica. Es miembro de la American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM).
| Honoring the journey: The psychologist's role in the patient's decision to stop fertility treatments | 17:30 |
|---|
Holds a degree in Veterinary Medicine from the University of Zaragoza, Spain. Earned a master's degree at UNESP (Brazil) and a doctorate and postdoctorate at USP (Brazil) in Reproductive Biotechnology. Senior embryologyst and co-founder and scientific advisor at Science For Everymind. Currently, works as educational coordinator at Associação Instituto Sapientiae and clinical researcher at Fertgroup.
| Ovarian stimulation and its impact on the egg quality | 15:30 |
|---|
| FROM OOCYTE TO STROLLER: CYCLE-LEVEL AI INTEGRATES OOCYTE COMPETENCE AND VITRIFIED EMBRYO VIABILITY TO PREDICT LIVE BIRTH PER RETRIEVAL AND ASSESS NEONATAL SAFETY IN FREEZE-ALL IVF | 09:00 | |
|---|---|---|
| AGE-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF RECOMBINANT LH SUPPLEMENTATION ON AI-DERIVED OOCYTE COMPETENCE, EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND LIVE BIRTH | 09:20 |
| ILLUMINATING THE BLACK BOX OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY: AN AI-DERIVED ULTRASOUND SCORE PREDICTS CLINICAL PREGNANCY AFTER FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER | 16:30 |
|---|
Medico obstetra con subespecialidad en Biólogo de la Reproducción, Sexólogo clínico andrología clínica y terapeuta sexual.
Maestria en Ciencias Médicas, Educación y Andrología.
Profesora del Diplomado Internacional para Clínicos de Alta Complejidad del PEC Online, de REDLARA.
| Asthenozoospermia/Teratozoospermia, which we have within our reach | 14:40 |
|---|
| When is pentoxifylline useful? | 16:30 |
|---|
| Body Builders and male subfertility or sexual disfunction? | 11:40 |
|---|
| Male infertility and endocrine disruptors. Reproductive outcomes | 14:20 |
|---|
Urologista especializado em infertilidade masculina, fundador e diretor médico da ANDROFERT, em Campinas. Professor colaborador da Disciplina de Urologia da UNICAMP e professor honorário de Medicina Reprodutiva da Universidade de Aarhus, na Dinamarca. É autor de mais de 500 publicações científicas, listado pelo ranking da Stanford-Elsevier entre os 1% pesquisadores mais citados do mundo. É reconhecido internacionalmente por suas contribuições à medicina reprodutiva, especialmente na área masculina.
| Sperm DNA Fragmentation: causes, evaluation and management in male infertility | 08:15 |
|---|
| ICSI with Testicular Sperm in Non-Azoospermic Men: Expert Opinion and Practical Algorithm | 11:00 |
|---|
| New perspectives on the impact of fertility preservation - Educational role of obstetricians and nurses in assisted reproductive technology. | 14:30 |
|---|
- Egresado de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
- Especialista en Microbiología en el Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México.
- Fellow en centros de reproducción humana: Conceptum, Bogotá Colombia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Sao Paulo Brasil, Instituto Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona España, Pec OnLine por la RedLara y Centro Unifertes, Caracas Venezuela.
- Director certificado de Laboratorio de FIV por la REDLARA, FILIUS San Luis Potosí, México.
- Ex director de la Sección de Interés de Biólogos de Laboratorio de Reproducción Asistida por la
Asociación Mexicana de Medicina de la Reproducción AMMR. De Agosto de 2019 - 2021
- Vocal de la AMMR 2021-2022
- 30 años de experiencia en Fertilización In Vitro.
- Profesor en cursos y congresos nacionales e internacionales.
- Subdirector de la región México de la REDLARA.
- Director de la seccion de Andrología por REDLARA
Biólogo con 25 años de experiencia en embriología clínica y dirección de laboratorios de R.A.
Doctor en Ciencias con mención en Fisiología por Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.
Fundador y Director del Centro EmbryoFertility Biomedicina Reproductiva en Lima-Perú.
Acreditador de laboratorios para incorporación de nuevos centros a REDLARA.
Miembro del comité de acreditación y de educación en área de embriología de REDLARA.
| Errors in the Assisted Reproduction laboratory: how to prevent them and ensure excellence from an accreditor's perspective | 16:30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Data analysis in the laboratory: the secret to detecting errors and ensuring perfect embryonic development | 17:30 |
| Automation in the Lab | 14:20 |
|---|
Bióloga, com doutorado em Biologia Celular e Molecular pela Faculdade de Medicina da USP de Ribeirão Preto. Atualmente, atua como gerente de contas estratégicas em NGS.
Embriólogo certificado por la ESHRE desde 2011.
Maestría en Biología Molecular en la Universidad de San Marcos Perú
Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas en la Universidad Libre de Bruselas.
Actualmente es Director de los Laboratorios de Reproducción Asistida y Genética de PRANOR – CONCEBIR en Perú.
| Hacia una ovodonación más eficiente: ¿todos los protocolos son iguales? Lunch Symposium sponsored by Merck | 12:30 |
|---|
El Dr. José Horcajadas es un reconocido biólogo especializado en biología
reproductiva y genómica. Es Doctor en Biología Molecular y ha liderado numerosos
proyectos de investigación centrados en la receptividad endometrial y la
implantación embrionaria. Co n más de 70 publicaciones científicas y 7 patentes, el
Dr. Horcajadas ha colaborado con clínicas de fertilidad e instituciones de
investigación de prestigio a nivel mundial. Además, es un conferenciante con amplia
experiencia y un colaborador clave en los avances de las tecnologías de reproducción
asistida. Ha sido fundador de iGenomix, Recombine, SINAE, Fulgenomics, iGLS,
HoMu Health Ventures y Overture Life. Actualmente, ejerce como Director Científico
en distintas instituciones.
-------
Dr. José Horcajadas is a renowned biologist specializing in reproductive biology and
genomics. He holds a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology and has led numerous research
projects focused on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation. With over 70
scientific publications and 7 patents, Dr. Horcajadas has collaborated with leading
fertility clinics and research institutions worldwide. He is also an experienced lecturer
and a key contributor to advancements in assisted reproductive technologies. He has
been foun der of iGenomix, Recombine, SINAE, Fulgenomics, iGLS, HoMu Health
Ventures and Overture Life. Currently, he serves as Scientific Director at different
institutions.
| Clinical use of exosome therapy in patients with diminished ovarian reserve: results and therapeutic protocols | 09:10 |
|---|
Médico graduado en Argentina (Universidad de Buenos Aires), residencia
en Tocoginecología en el Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, y Fellow en
Reproducción Asistida en Huntington Reproductive Center, Pasadena,
EEUU. Especialista certificado en Medicina Reproductiva, Ultrasonido y
Cirugía endoscópica.
| HIGHER BLASTOCYST FORMATION AND EUPLOIDY RATES USING HYPERSPERM IN IVF AND ICSI CYCLES | 00:00 |
|---|
| Dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger for elective fertility preservation | 11:40 |
|---|
| Individualised luteal phase for cryotransfer | 14:20 |
|---|
| The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors | 08:00 |
|---|
| FROM OOCYTE TO STROLLER: CYCLE-LEVEL AI INTEGRATES OOCYTE COMPETENCE AND VITRIFIED EMBRYO VIABILITY TO PREDICT LIVE BIRTH PER RETRIEVAL AND ASSESS NEONATAL SAFETY IN FREEZE-ALL IVF | 09:00 | |
|---|---|---|
| AGE-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF RECOMBINANT LH SUPPLEMENTATION ON AI-DERIVED OOCYTE COMPETENCE, EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND LIVE BIRTH | 09:20 |
| ILLUMINATING THE BLACK BOX OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY: AN AI-DERIVED ULTRASOUND SCORE PREDICTS CLINICAL PREGNANCY AFTER FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER | 16:30 |
|---|
George Kassis es un emprendedor apasionado por el entrenamiento de médicos y cree en el poder de la práctica para transformar la preparación en mejores resultados. Actualmente, se desempeña como CEO e instructor de Medicalsim, liderando iniciativas que buscan elevar la calidad de la formación médica.
| Group 1 | 00:00 |
|---|
| Group 2 | 00:00 |
|---|
| Group 4 | 00:00 |
|---|
Catherine Kuhn Jacobs es embrióloga con notable experiencia en biopsia de blastocistos, evaluación embrionaria con time-lapse e inteligencia artificial, obtenida en los años que trabajó en las clínicas del grupo Huntington/Eugin en São Paulo, Brasil. Tiene un Máster en Reproducción Asistida por la Universitat Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona y es responsable por el Soporte Clínico de Dispositivos Médicos del Vitrolife Group en Latinoamérica.
Catherine Kuhn Jacobs é embriologista com notável experiência em biópsia embrionária, avaliação de embriões em time-lapse e inteligência artificial, obtida nos anos em que trabalhou nas clínicas do grupo Huntington/Eugin em São Paulo, Brasil. Possui Mestrado em Reprodução Assistida pela Universidade Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona e é responsável pelo Suporte Clínico de Dispositivos Médicos de Vitrolife Group para a América Latina.
| Detección de Triploidias embrionarias: Morfocinética vs Genética | 10:00 |
|---|
Médico com residência em Genética Médica e Fellow Oncogenética pela USP-RP.Doutorando em Reprodução Humana pelo Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia FMRP-USP.Fellowship em Aconselhamento Genético pela Sociedade Europeia de Genética Humana.
| Carrier testing (Carrier Screening): | 14:15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Dominant Disease Panel: Real Risk in Reproduction | 15:00 |
| Session 3: communication & shared decision | 17:15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion of clinical cases | 17:30 |
Es psicóloga y Magíster en Psicología Clínica por la Universidad Pontifícia Católica de Rio Grande do Sul, donde defendió la tesis “Calidad de vida, estrés y estrategias de afrontamiento en parejas sometidas a tratamientos de fertilización asistida”. Además, es psicoanalista con formación en la Asociación Psicoanalítica Sigmund Freud, donde es miembro pleno y coordinadora de seminarios en la formación en psicoanálisis.
Cuenta con casi 30 años de trayectoria en el acompañamiento de personas y parejas con infertilidad y en procesos de reproducción asistida.
Además del ejercicio clínico, está comprometida con la transmisión de conocimientos en el área. Actualmente, es docente del curso de Posgrado en Reproducción Humana Asistida y Atención Psicosocial en la Infertilidad en el Instituto Suassuna.
Es miembro del Comité de Psicología de la Sociedad Brasileña de Reproducción Humana (SBRH). Es socia de la Sociedad Brasileña de Reproducción Asistida (SBRA), participando regularmente en sus congresos.
Es autora y coautora de diversos capítulos de libros en el área de la reproducción humana, además, de compiladora del libro “Psicología en Reproducción Asistida”, junto con Julieta Quayle y Lia Mara Netto, publicado por la Editorial dos Editores.
| A desire for perfection? Emotions, ethics, and expectations in preimplantation genetic testing | 14:30 |
|---|
Master’s Degree in Assisted Human Reproduction, University of Valencia (Spain)PhD in Genetics, Genomics and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University (USA)Adjunct Professor, Department of Human Genetics, Rutgers University, New Jersey (USA)
| PGT-P - different interests and implications: for whom? | 15:30 |
|---|
| Evolution of PGT-A (NGS, resolution, accuracy, mosaicism) | 16:50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion of clinical cases | 17:30 |
| The future of the Genetics Laboratory | 15:30 |
|---|
Dr. en Ciencia Biológicas – Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
Especialista en embriología clínica – SAMeR - REDLARA - SAEC
Director del Laboratorio de Biología de la Reproducción de Medicina Reproductiva Fertilis - San Isidro - Argentina
Profesor titular de la Universidad de Belgrano (Argentina)
Profesor invitado de las Universidades de Buenos Aires, La Plata y Tres de Febrero (Argentina)
Presidente de la Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida (REDLARA)
Biólogo molecular especializado en microbioma y biotecnología con más de 10 años
de experiencia científica. Dirige la operativa de Pronacera, laboratorio centrado en
microbioma con calidad certificada bajo normas ISO, combinando investigación
aplicada con consultoría. Ha liderado proyectos innovadores en salud y reproducción
en los cuales ha obtenido distintos premios, y es miembro activo de la Comisión de
Sanidad del Colegio de Biólogos de Andalucía.
| Aplicación clínica del estudio del microbioma reproductivo en reproducción asistida | 10:30 |
|---|
| Is it more important the PGT or the physiology of implantation? | 08:00 |
|---|
El Dr. Jorge Alejandro Michel Vergara es especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia, recertificado por el CMGO, y cuenta con un Máster en Reproducción Humana y Certificación Internacional en Cirugía Robótica. Actualmente, es Director de CERFERTIL, y ejerce como Profesor de pregrado en la UdeG y de posgrado en la UNAM. Previamente, fue Ex-Presidente del Colegio de Gineco-Obstetras del Estado de Jalisco AC. Además, es Secretario de la Asociación Mexicana de Medicina de la Reproducción, ha impartido más de 500 conferencias en congresos nacionales e internacionales sobre Reproducción Humana, y es autor de 50 capítulos en diversos libros de Ginecología, Endocrinología Ginecológica y Reproducción Humana.
| What to do in cases of implantation failure with euploid embryos | 12:20 |
|---|
Taccyanna Ali is currently the scientific manager and genetic advisor for Latin America of Igenomix laboratory, part of Vitrolife Group.
She is a biologist and received her two M.Sc. degrees at the University of Sao Paulo in “Immunology and Molecular Biology” and “Genetic Counselling and Human Genomics”.
She is highly experienced in genetic counseling for couples/patients in the field of reproductive medicine.
| Detección de Triploidias embrionarias: Morfocinética vs Genética | 10:00 |
|---|
| CHROMOSOMAL ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING AFTER MISCARRIAGE FOLLOWING EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER | 09:20 |
|---|
Médico y Ginecólogo por la Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay.
Master y PhD por la Universidad Católica de Lovaina, Bélgica.
Especialista en Medicina y Cirugía Reproductiva (Leuven Institute, Bélgica).
Fundador y Director de Neolife, Asunción, Paraguay.
MBA por la Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, España.
Ex Director REDLARA Región Sur.
| Strategy, transition and future readiness: a legacy for the next generation | 14:30 |
|---|
| Y CHROMOSOME HETEROCHROMATIN POLYMORPHISM (YQH+): IMPACT ON SPERMATOGENESIS AND ACCELERATED AGE-RELATED DECLINE | 09:00 |
|---|
Medicina Reproductiva
Director Profert Medical Group.
Director REDLARA Región Caribe.
| The future of ART in Latam seen by its actors | 08:00 |
|---|
Carlos Morente es el Director Médico de PROAR y Director del Registro Argentino de Fertilización Asistida (RAFA). Adicionalmente, es Miembro del Comité Asesor del Registro Latinoamericano (CARLA).Opción 2: Concisa, utilizando aposiciones
| Born through ART: Bioethical discussions surrounding communication about origin | 15:00 |
|---|
| Biology and psychological impact: discourses, communication and decision-making in gamete donation | 16:30 |
|---|
Sócia-Fundadora, Diretora Científica e Responsável Técnica da GENESIS - Centro de Assistência em Reprodução Humana em Brasília/Distrito Federal;
Membro da Câmara Técnica de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia/Núcleo de Reprodução Assistida do Conselho Federal de Medicina/CFM;
Vice-Presidente da Rede Latino-americana de Reprodução Assistida - REDLARA, gestão 2023-2027.
Es doctoranda en Psicología, UCES. Licenciada en Psicología, UBA. Psicóloga Orientada en Reproducción Humana y Fertilización Asistida por SAMeR. Diplomada en Metodología de investigación en humanidades, UBA. Tiene amplia experiencia en docencia universitaria. Sus líneas de investigación actuales exploran sobre evaluación psicológica, gestación por sustitución, diversidad familiar, cuidado de la fertilidad, educación y bioética. Es presidenta de la Sociedad Argentina de Psicología en Reproducción Humana Asistida -SAPRHA-. Miembro activo de la Sociedad Argentina de Medicina reproductiva (SAMeR) y de European Fertility Society (EFS). Es coordinadora del área de fertilidad y reproducción del Instituto de Psicología y Psicoanálisis del Litoral (IPPL). Miembro de REDLIBRE -Red Latina de investigadores en Biotecnologías reproductivas.
| Born through ART: Bioethical discussions surrounding communication about origin | 15:00 |
|---|
Embrióloga Clínica y Directora de los Laboratorios de Embriología y Andrología en IVI Panamá, con más de 18 años de experiencia en reproducción asistida.
Posee una Maestría en Embriología Clínica por la Universidad de Valencia (España) y participa activamente en la formación internacional de embriólogos.
Ha sido conferencista, organizadora y evaluadora científica en congresos internacionales, y ha contribuido al desarrollo del campo mediante publicaciones científicas y participación en investigaciones sobre innovación en reproducción asistida,
Fue Vice-Directora de la Región Caribe de REDLARA (2021–2025) y actualmente forma parte del Comité de Apoyo al Registro Latinoamericano de Reproducción Asistida (CARLA).
| The embryo: time-lapse and metabolomics: where are we? | 15:00 |
|---|
| Anvisa: the Brazilian experience in reproductive technologies regulation | 00:00 |
|---|
Médico veterinario – Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
Magister en Embriología Clínica – Universidad de Leeds, UK. Tesis: Transfer of two embryos and the risk of multiple pregnancy.
Diplomado en Periodismo científico – Universidad Favaloro – Editorial Perfil.
Diplomado en Bioética – Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).
Magister en Bioética - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO) – Tesis: El estatus moral de los embriones in vitro y el problema de la potencialidad.
Miembro del Comité de Bioética de CEGYR.
Miembro del Comité de Bioética de REDLARA.
Miembro Honorario de REDLARA.
| The moral status of the in vitro embryo: the view of clinical embryologists | 16:30 |
|---|
El Dr. Alexander W. Pastuszak, doctor en medicina y doctorado, es urólogo, científico y emprendedor. Se desempeña como profesor asociado de Urología y jefe de la Oficina de Innovación de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Utah, además de cofundador y director ejecutivo de Paterna Biosciences. Alex ha realizado una extensa investigación en ciencias clínicas y básicas, galardonada y financiada por los NIH. Ha publicado más de 140 artículos revisados por pares y varios libros, y colabora regularmente con los medios de comunicación y la comunidad. Alex ha fundado o cofundado cuatro empresas, dos de ellas desinvertidas, y continúa contribuyendo a la comunidad emprendedora.
| AI in sperm selection | 11:20 |
|---|
| Artificial spermatogenesis | 14:40 |
|---|
Embrióloga Clínica Senior con una destacada trayectoria en la gestión y dirección de laboratorios de reproducción asistida. Ha liderado la comunidad científica como Ex-Presidente de la Sociedad Argentina de Embriología Clínica (SAEC) y actualmente desempeña un rol clave en la excelencia profesional como Miembro del Comité de Acreditaciones de SAMeR. En el ámbito clínico, lidera la operación técnica como Directora del Laboratorio en CRECER.
Presidenta Asociación Latino-Iberoamericana de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación (ALTEC).
Doctora en Ciencia. Gestora Tecnológica y Analista de Datos: Vigilancia Tecnológica, Inteligencia Estratégica y de Mercados (enfocado a la Data Science).
Docente / Investigadora Universitaria en LATAM.
| From the Lab to the algorithm: disruptive innovation in AR with AI and Data Science | 14:40 |
|---|
| Algorithms that give life: How AI, Technology Watch and Data Analysis are transforming Assisted Reproduction | 08:30 |
|---|
Médico Militar. Maestro y Doctor en Ciencias.
Director del Instituto Vida Guadalajara. Profesor Titular de la Especialización en BRH (UNAM) y del Diplomado en línea de BRH (Univ. de Guadalajara).
Académico Titular de la Academia Nacional de Medicina. Posgrado en Boston y Londres. Diplomado por el American Board of Obst and Gyn. Director del Comité Educación de REDLARA. Profesor Titular del Diplomado Alta Especialización PEC Online de REDLARA.
Autor: Atención Integral de la Infertilidad 4ª Edición 2020. Editorial Médica Panamericana ( México). Editor Handbook of Clinical Procedures. REDLARA. In press
| Is it more important the PGT or the physiology of implantation? | 08:00 |
|---|
Diretor do Fertilitat- Centro de Medicina Reprodutiva- Porto Alegre.
Doutor em Medicina pela Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
Ex- Presidente da SBRH
Ex-Diretor da RedLara.
El Prof. Dr. Polyzos es presidente de la Fundación Dexeus y director científico y responsable de Fertilidad Dexeus en el Grupo Dexeus Mujer en Barcelona, España. También es profesor visitante en el Departamento de Medicina Reproductiva de la Universidad de Gante, Bélgica, desde 2021.
El Prof. Polyzos es el investigador principal de varios ensayos multinacionales pioneros a gran escala y un referente clave en el campo de la Medicina Reproductiva para el tratamiento de pacientes con baja respuesta ovárica en programas de FIV, la predicción de la respuesta ovárica y el envejecimiento ovárico prematuro, con más de 200 ponencias invitadas en congresos internacionales.
Es editor de sección en RBMO, miembro del grupo de desarrollo de guías de la ESHRE para la estimulación ovárica y ha sido consultor editorial para el PIER (Recurso de Información y Educación para Médicos) del Colegio Americano de Médicos (ACP). El profesor Polyzos ha publicado más de 200 artículos en revistas con revisión por pares indexadas en PubMed, con más de 5000 citas y un índice h de 51 en Google Académico. Sus líneas de investigación incluyen la endocrinología reproductiva, los marcadores de reserva ovárica, la baja respuesta ovárica a la estimulación y la genética del envejecimiento ovárico prematuro.
| AI in reproductive medicine | 15:30 |
|---|
| Artificial vs Natural FET. Should we go back to nature for all? | 14:00 |
|---|
| Individualized ovarian stimulation | 10:50 |
|---|
Licenciada en Nutrición Humana Especialista en Obesidad, Diabetes y Nutrición Deportiva. Con más de 27 años de experiencia ayudando a pacientes a mejorar su calidad de vida, desde un enfoque integral, personalizado y basado en evidencia científica. Formación complementaria en Nutrición y Fertilidad, en Nutrigenética: GeneXVitae y GeneXFit y en Climaterio, Nutrición y Ejercicio.
| Nutrition - supplements and infertility: is there a rationale? | 17:30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking to the specialists | 18:00 |
| Alimentation impact in male and female fertility | 11:00 |
|---|
Matrona Coordinadora de Clínica MEDS y coordinadora de programa de ovodonación.
Miembro de Sociedad Chilena de Medicina Reproductiva SOCMER.
Miembro de Comisión de enfermería y profesionales de salud en Reproducción Asistida REDLARA.
| Importance of the male factor and its implications in the results of a high complexity treatment - role of the obstetrician and nurse in R.A. | 14:00 |
|---|
| Genetic tests indicated in medical consultation - Educational role of the Nurse - Obstetrician - Midwife | 17:00 |
|---|
| Opening & strategic vision | 14:00 |
|---|
| Closing remarks and a vision for the future | 18:15 |
|---|
Médica ginecóloga especialista en Medicina Reproductiva y Cirugía Mínimamente Invasiva, con dedicación al manejo integral de la infertilidad y a la cirugía conservadora orientada a optimizar el potencial reproductivo.
Es Licenciada en Psicología y Licenciada en Marketing y Publicidad por la Universidad Americana de Asunción, Paraguay. Se especializó en psicología jurídica y forense, Universidad Autónoma del Paraguay. Es diplomada en diagnóstico en sexualidad clínica en el ECIS -Educación, Clínica e Investigación en Sexualidad-. Posee formación internacional en Terapia Gestáltica, recursos gestálticos aplicables a niños y adolescentes, neurociencias, psicoinmunoendocrinología y medicina del estrés, realizados en el Centro Gestáltico de San Isidro, Argentina. Su formación en mindfulness y compasión, activación conductual para la depresión (modelo BATD) y habilidades terapéuticas basadas en DBT la realizó en el Centro Especializado en Psicoterapia -CEP- y DBT Latinoamericana de Paraguay. Complementa su formación con estudios en Didáctica Universitaria en la Universidad Americana.
| Honoring the journey: The psychologist's role in the patient's decision to stop fertility treatments | 17:30 |
|---|
Médico Gineco-obstetra y Biólogo de la Reproducción por la Universidad Autónoma de San Luís Potosí (Hosp. Central Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto) y Universidad Autónoma de México (INPER).
Instituto Nacional de Perinatología.
Coordinador Médico › CEPAM
Revisor › Revista Ginecología y Obstetricia de México
Profesor de especialidad en G&O y Posgrado de Infertilidad y subespecialidad de Biología de la Reproducción Humana (INPER y UNAM).
Director asociado › Fertilidad Integral, CDMX.
| PGT: no! | 17:20 |
|---|
Gerald Schatten is a Professor at the U Pitt Medical School who has directly trained over 50 doctoral and postdoctoral fellows, mentored >1,250 more in the ‘Frontiers in…’ advanced training course series he founded, and his > 300 papers have appeared in premier journals, including Nature and Science. Dr. Schatten is an eloquent advocate for research in reproduction, development, regeneration, and stem cells, as well as being an advocate for belonging, inclusion and meritocracy; for these latter, he has been acknowledged by being among the recipients of NIH’s inaugural award as an Outstanding Mentor.
| Stem cell and gene therapies: FDA-approved already and prospects beyond 2026 | 11:20 |
|---|
| Can REDLARA rescue biomedical sciences in the North? | 08:50 |
|---|
| Conception and misconceptions | 10:30 |
|---|
Ginecologista especialista em Reprodução Humana Assistida, diretor da Clínica Conceber, em Curitiba/PR. Possui formação complementar em centros internacionais renomados como Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine e no Reproductive Medicine Associates. Atua na área científica como revisor de periódicos e membro do Conselho Editorial do Jornal Brasileiro de Reprodução Assistida. É tutor e acreditador da REDLARA. Também participou do Comitê de Reprodução Humana da SOGIPA, da Comissão Nacional de Fertilização Assistida da FEBRASGO e foi Delegado do Paraná na Sociedade Brasileira de Reproduçã
| Is sperm FISH still useful? | 15:10 |
|---|
Dr. Sciorio holds a degree in Science Biology (110/110 cum laude) from the University of Naples “Federico II” and a Master’s degree in Science and Biotechnology from Edinburgh Napier University Scotland. He has nearly 30 years of experience in assisted reproductive techniques, including preimplantation genetic testing and cryopreservation. His professional career spans both research and clinical embryology, and he has worked in several countries, including Italy, France, England, Scotland, Australia, Canada, Armenia, India, Pakistan, Nepal, Middle East, and Switzerland. He is a state-registered Clinical Scientist (HCPC) and holds licenses for ICSI and embryo biopsy. His current professional interests include blastocyst-stage embryo culture, time-lapse technology, male infertility, and vitrification. He has authored and co-authored more than 70 manuscripts published in high-impact factor journals. In recent years, he worked as Consultant Embryologist at the IVF Department of Royale Hayat Hospital in Kuwait City, Kuwait (2019-2023), and from 2023 to 2025 as Laboratory Director at the fertility clinic of CHUV (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois) in Lausanne, Switzerland. In 2025 he joined the Vitrolife-Group, Sweden as a Senior Clinical Support and Consultant Embryologist.
| Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle | 08:30 |
|---|
| Association among Embryo culture, Cryopreservation and Birth defects in ART | 16:30 |
|---|
Professor Associado de Reprodução Humana na PUC Minas.
Ph.D. e pós-doutor em Reprodução Humana pela UFRJ. Pós-Doutor em Bioética/Medicina pela UFRGS.
Ex-presidente da SBRA.
Diretor Executivo Nacional da SBRA.
Editor associado do JBRA.
Membro da Sociedade Brasileira de Andrologia.
• Miembro del Laboratorio de Embriologia de CEGyR
• Embriólogo senior certificado por SAEC-SAMER
• Miembro de la comisión directiva de la Sociedad Argentina de Embriologia Clinica (SAEC)
• Cofundador y miembro de la comision de Academia de SAEC
----------
• Member of the Embryology Laboratory at CEGyR
• Senior Embryologist certified by SAEC-SAMER
• Member of the Board of Directors of the Argentine Society of Clinical Embryology (SAEC)
• Co-founder and member of the SAEC Academy Commission
| Mastering Ultra-Fast Vitrification Protocols: From Principles to Live Practical Demonstration | 10:00 |
|---|
El Dr José Teruel cuenta con más de 15 años de experiencia como embriólogo clínico. Actualmente es Director de los Laboratorios de Fecundación in Vitro del Equipo Juana Crespo en España, y está especialmente especializado en preservación de la fertilidad, con un foco destacado en la criopreservación de córtex ovárico.
| Optimization of Sperm Selection using ZyMot 850: Clinical Experience | 00:00 |
|---|
Psicóloga General Sanitaria, especializada en Psicooncología y Psicología de la Fertilidad, con 24 años de experiencia profesional. Ha desarrollado su carrera tanto en el ámbito privado como en equipos multidisciplinares, ofreciendo terapia cognitivo-conductual y acompañando a pacientes en procesos complejos como la enfermedad, el duelo y la infertilidad.
Su compromiso con el crecimiento profesional la llevó a completar un Máster en Psicooncología y otro en Infertilidad, además de formación complementaria en Psicología Sanitaria y Jurídica.
Ha estado profundamente involucrada con la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad (SEF), participando activamente en comités, grupos de trabajo y, actualmente, como miembro del Registro Nacional y miembro del comité permanente del Grupo de Donación de Gametos y Embriones. Colabora regularmente como speaker en congresos nacionales e internacionales, centrando su labor en la sensibilización sobre la fertilidad y en la promoción del cuidado psicológico en la medicina reproductiva.
Además, posee el certificado europeo EuroPsy en Psicología Clínica y de la Salud y actualmente cursa el Doctorado en Psicología Clínica y de la Salud en la Universidad de Valencia.
| Communication and emotional management in assisted reproduction processes | 14:00 |
|---|
| Emotional managements in patients under ART treatment | 11:20 |
|---|
| Psychological evaluation of the donors | 17:00 |
|---|
Abogado costarricense con especialidad en Salud Pública, Derechos de la Salud y Bioética. Desde enero de 2024 es miembro del Comité de Bioética de la Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida (REDLARA
| How to address bioethical challenges in the care of patients with fertility problems | 17:30 |
|---|
La Dra. Rita Vassena es la Directora Médica Global de Fertilidad de CooperSurgical. Anteriormente fue Directora Científica Global del Grupo Eugin y ha tenido un papel clave en la formación, la investigación y el desarrollo de la medicina reproductiva a nivel internacional.
| Electronic witnessing as a tool for clinical excellence | 00:00 |
|---|
| No trade-offs on safety: the value of electronic witnessing in assisted reproduction | 00:00 |
|---|
Director Laboratorio Instituto Vida – Guadalajara – MéxicoProfesor del Programa Biología de la Reproducción (UNAM)Profesor del Programa PEC Online – Red LARADirector Sección Embriólogos AMMR 2023-2025Vocal Mesa Directiva AMMR 2025-2026Asesor Científico MIM Fertility
| Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its application in Assisted Reproduction | 16:30 |
|---|
| AI in embryo selection | 11:40 |
|---|
| Gametes and embryos obtained from stem cells | 14:00 |
|---|
Senior Embryologist | Scientific Advisor | Medical Scientific Liaison
Kitazato - Dibimed, España.
Andreu holds a degree in Biotechnology with a specialization in Cellular and Molecular
Biotechnology from the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain. He also completed a Master’s in Reproductive Biology and Assisted Human Reproduction Techniques at Dexeus University Hospital in Barcelona, earning the distinction of Excellent and Honours.
He has contributed to multiple scientific studies, focusing on embryonic morphokinetics and developing embryo prediction algorithms using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.
Andreu has worked as a clinical embryologist in renowned IVF clinics in Italy and Spain, including EUGIN Clinic in Barcelona. Alongside his clinical work, he has trained and mentored over 3,000 embryologists worldwide, sharing his expertise to support the next generation of professionals.
In 2022, Andreu joined Kitazato – Dibimed as Senior Embryologist and Scientific Advisor.
Currently, he serves as Medical Scientific Liaison and Scientific Coordinator, focusing on
innovation and the development of new products and protocols for Kitazato. He is committed to providing technical, scientific, and educational support to clinics and embryologists globally, enhancing laboratory procedures and advancing the field of assisted reproduction.
-----------
Senior Embryologist | Scientific Advisor | Medical Scientific Liaison
Kitazato - Dibimed, España.
Andreu es graduado en Biotecnología, con Mención en Biotecnología Celular y Molecular, en la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España. Realizó el Máster en Biología de la Reproducción y Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida en el Hospital Universitario Dexeus de Barcelona, España, obteniendo la calificación de Excelente y Matrícula de Honor.
Ha participado en numerosos estudios científicos, centrándose en la morfocinética embrionaria y en el desarrollo de algoritmos de predicción embrionaria mediante Machine Learning e Inteligencia Artificial. Andreu ha trabajado como embriólogo clínico en prestigiosas clínicas de FIV en Italia y España, incluyendo la Clínica EUGIN en Barcelona. Paralelamente, ha formado y tutorizado a más de 3.000 embriólogos de todo el mundo, contribuyendo al desarrollo de la próxima generación de profesionales.
En 2022, Andreu se incorporó a Kitazato – Dibimed como Embriólogo Senior y Asesor Científico.
Actualmente, ocupa el cargo de Medical Scientific Liaison y Coordinador Científico, donde se centra en la innovación y el desarrollo de nuevos productos y protocolos para Kitazato. Su compromiso es brindar soporte técnico, científico y educativo a clínicas y embriólogos de todo el mundo, mejorando los procedimientos de laboratorio y avanzando en el campo de la reproducción asistida.
| Mastering Ultra-Fast Vitrification Protocols: From Principles to Live Practical Demonstration | 10:00 |
|---|
Médico com residência em Genética Médica e Fellow Oncogenética pela USP-RP.Doutorando em Reprodução Humana pelo Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia FMRP-USP.Fellowship em Aconselhamento Genético pela Sociedade Europeia de Genética Humana.
| Fertility Panel: When to Investigate Beyond the Basics | 14:45 |
|---|
| Session 3: communication & shared decision | 17:15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion of clinical cases | 17:30 |
Maestro de la Medicina Reproductiva de Chile y recientemente nombrado Maestro de la Obstetricia y Ginecología de Chile.
Profesor Emérito de la Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Chile y director del Programa de Ética y Políticas Publicas en Reproducción Humana. Fundador de la Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida (REDLARA) y director responsable del Registro Latinoamericano.
Co-fundador y vicepresident del International Committee for Monitoring ART - ICMART.
Ha recibido numerosos reconocimientos nacionales e internacionales, donde destacan el Clinical Science Award otorgado por ESHRE, miembro honorario de la International Federation of Fertility Societies IFFS, y de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Investigadores en Reproducción Humana ALIRH. Fellow del American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology y miembro correspondiente de la Academia Nacional de Medicina de Francia.
Ha publicado extensamente en aspectos biomédicos y éticos en reprodiucción humana.
| Big data after 35 years of Latin American Registry of Assisted Reproduction | 19:00 |
|---|

RAQUEL URTEAGA
Psicóloga General Sanitaria, especializada en Psicooncología y Psicología de la Fertilidad, con 24 años de experiencia profesional. Ha desarrollado su carrera tanto en el ámbito privado como en equipos multidisciplinares, ofreciendo terapia cognitivo-conductual y acompañando a pacientes en procesos complejos como la enfermedad, el duelo y la infertilidad.
Su compromiso con el crecimiento profesional la llevó a completar un Máster en Psicooncología y otro en Infertilidad, además de formación complementaria en Psicología Sanitaria y Jurídica.
Ha estado profundamente involucrada con la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad (SEF), participando activamente en comités, grupos de trabajo y, actualmente, como miembro del Registro Nacional y miembro del comité permanente del Grupo de Donación de Gametos y Embriones. Colabora regularmente como speaker en congresos nacionales e internacionales, centrando su labor en la sensibilización sobre la fertilidad y en la promoción del cuidado psicológico en la medicina reproductiva.
Además, posee el certificado europeo EuroPsy en Psicología Clínica y de la Salud y actualmente cursa el Doctorado en Psicología Clínica y de la Salud en la Universidad de Valencia
TEST
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.